Clinical Observation On Treatment Of Middle Aged Knee Joint Osteoarthritis (Qi Deficiency And Blood Stasis Type) By

Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy analysis knee Treatment of knee osteoarthritis (Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome), and to explore its therapeutic mechanism.Methods:60 met the inclusion criteria of knee osteoarthritis (Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome) were randomly divided into treatment and control group, the treatment group halfway off one cases,30 cases of the actual number of cases in the treatment group of 29 patients in the control group. Comparison of age, gender, disease duration, disease and two patients with lesions, the two groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05), comparable. Treatment:Treatment of the control group was treated with knee pain, the specific prescriptions as follows:Cyathula 15g, angelica 12g, Guizhi 9g, white peony root 15g, licorice 9g, Salvia 15g, Millettla 15g, lycopodii 15g, Scorpion 6g Epimedium 15g, monkshood 6g (fry), Chuanxiong 6g, papaya 15g, Poria 15g, tangerine peel 9g, Amomum 6g, castor seed cotton 20g, Alisma 9g, Plantago 10g (including fry), wind 10g. Medication methods:Add water 500ml,200ml concentrated fry,3 times daily after meals. Treatment groups:oral glucosamine sulfate capsules (Glucosamine) treatment. Observation period was 1 month. OUTCOME MEASURES:Contrast the knee WOMAC scale scores, TCM Syndrome Scale score before and after treatment, and the total efficiency. Comparing the data and statistical analysis.Results:WOMAC knee Scale contains knee pain, knee stiffness, difficulty in daily life three subprojects. Contrast score changes were the three items before and after treatment. In terms of knee pain, within the group,treatment After the pain scores of comparison group and the treatment group were significantly decreased, there are significant differences (p <0.05); between the two groups,before treatment,pain scores between the two groups was no significant difference (p>0.05), after the treatment the treatment group scores were significantly lower than the control group, a significant difference (p<0.05). In terms of knee stiffness, within the group after treatment the stiffness scores were significantly reduced, a significant difference (p<0.05); stiffness scores between the two groups was not statistically significant between the two groups before treatment (p> 0.05), treatment After the stiffness scores of the treatment group was significantly lower than the control group and it is significantly different (p<0.05). In daily life difficult aspect,scores after treatment were significantly decreased, there are significant differences (p<0.05); between the two groups before treatment, the daily difficulties of life score was no significant difference (p> 0.05), treatment After the treatment group scores were significantly lower than the control group, a significant difference (p<0.05). Total contrast efficacy, the treatment group group 2 cases of clinical control, markedly effective in 15 cases, effective in 10 cases, Invalid 2 cases, the total efficiency of 93.1%; control group, one case of clinical control, markedly effective in 9 cases, effective in 14 cases, Invalid 6 cases, total efficiency of 80.0%. Treatment group was higher efficiency, a significant difference (p<0.05).Conclusion:The knee capsule side comparison of glucosamine sulfate in osteoarthritis of the knee remission (Qi and Blood) clinical symptoms has certain advantages, there are obvious advantages in terms of improving the TCM syndromes and clinical safety.