Before 2016,although the real estate market in our country had gone through several rounds of regulation and control,the price of housing still grew too fast,the investment on real estate was more and more fierce.The main reason was that the governments and functional department all over the country had not reached a consensus on the multi-properties of real estate,instead,they formulated regulation policies based on their respective understanding,which were not able to solve the problems of real estate.On this basis,the properties and definition of real estate had been corrected in the Central Economic Working Conference at the end of2016,in which the residential property of real estate had been defined as “House is for living not for investing”.This definition has not only corrected the theory of real estate,furthermore,it is a guidance of the administrative authority to its management,and has provided a basic reference for the government at all levels of real estate macro-control and market supervision.Under the background of “House is for living not for investing”,R city has formulated a serious of regulation policies for real estate.After the implementation of these policies,property developers,real estate agents and speculators have all adjusted their actions to tackle this spirit,which has damaged the interests of house buyers and affected the normal order of real estate in R city.Combining the external impact of regulation policies of real estate market on the supply side and demand side,the paper has comprehensively analyzed the external impact of R City’s real estate market regulation policy on developers,real estate agents,speculators and house buyers under the background of " House is for living not for investing ".Through the selection of some staff of real estate enterprises,real estate agents,house buyers and government cadres as the objects of investigation and interview,the paper has collected the supervision problems existing in the real estate market of R city.By using Max Weber’s Dual Rationality Theory,Interest Group Theory and Fuzzy Governance Theory,the paper has analyzed the regulatory problems existing in the real estate market of R city,and has further explored the errors of governance logic and the loopholes of governance mechanism that generated these problems.From the micro level,the paper has put forward suggestions,which was to strengthen collaborative supervision and whole-process supervision.From the macro level,the paper has provided suggestions from the perspective of long-term mechanism establishment. |