| Certain western countries view the emergence of State-led economic models as a threat to their free economic models as some developing countries rise through the use of state-owned enterprises(SOEs).To suppress SOEs,they use the legal device of competitive neutrality.Due to this,Competition neutrality from the domestic competition policies in Australia evolved into the state-owned enterprises and designated monopolies chapter in CPTPP.The discrimination against SOEs and the removal of the requirement for independent decision-making by the enterprise itself serve as the foundation for the SOEs provisions in the CPTPP.During the institutional transition process,they stop being neutral.For developing countries led by the rise of SOEs,like China,understanding how to apply the special value of legally breaching in exemption clauses of CPTPP is crucial.Taking into account that the purpose of the exemption clauses is to give the country the opportunity to justify their evasion of treaty obligations.Developing nations should thoroughly research exception clauses,taking into account the terms’ meaning,how they are invoked,and the laws that support them.On this basis,parties and prospective parties can efficiently manage legal risks and problems,stop other nations from misusing such exemption mechanisms,and give focused tactics regarding negotiation preparations.To comprehensively comprehend the range of SOEs that may be covered by the CPTPP’s regulation,China also has to combine specific terms concerning the standards for evaluating SOEs and exemption clauses we may cite.On the one hand,equity adjustment or scale control can be used to enable the application of exemption clauses for Chinese SOEs.On the other hand,we can work to negotiate exemption clauses that are advantageous to China.The most crucial aspect of all of this is to recognize the existing regulations’ deviation from competitive neutrality.China must therefore work with other emerging nations to build a system of competition that is both competitive and profitable for all parties involved.The existing international laws must be adhered to before China has a strong enough international voice to influence how they are created.Regarding the CPTPP,to which China plans to accede through negotiations,we oppose regulations that discriminate against state-owned businesses,but this will not stop us from incorporating some of their reasonable provisions into our domestic policies and actively deepening the reform of state-owned businesses in the context of fair competition. |