| Algorithmic decision-making systems embedded in the administrative field are of great practical value to facilitate efficient,accurate analysis and scientific decision-making in administration.While people have great expectations for the development of contemporary intelligent society,the legal risks of algorithmic decision-making in automated administrative applications are gradually being exposed due to the shortcomings of decision-making technology and many subjective and objective reasons in the social environment,and the urgent demand for efficient governance in the context of automated administration has created a crisis of automated generalization such as data abuse,over-reliance and algorithmic black box,which affects the administrative rule of law,deprives some administrative The legal risks of automated administrative applications are gradually being exposed.To this end,it is necessary to improve the scientific and reasonable framework of automated administrative rules from the perspective of the legal discipline of intelligent governance,strengthen the administrative theory support led by the administrative organs,clarify the tool attributes of AI,and draw the red line of the depth of automation embedding,supplemented by the proactive review system as the first line of defense for the crisis of automated administrative generalization,and take the improvement of the accountability mechanism as the last line of defense,Put the automated administration with intelligent thinking under the normative guidance and value normalization of the legal governance paradigm,so as to give full play to the optimal support efficiency of algorithmic decision-making in automated administration. |