Research On The Maximization Of The Mediation Role Of Public Security Organs In Civil Disputes

At present,our society is in a special period of social transformation,great economic development,great awareness of people’s rights,redistribution of interests,and great changes in production and lifestyle.The frequency of people’s problems has increased significantly,and there has been a huge contradiction with the existing dispute resolution mechanism..General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out at the Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China that it is necessary to establish a one-stop multi-dispute resolution mechanism with Chinese characteristics.After that,it continued to emphasize the need to build a "comprehensive governance system for social security" that investigates and resolves conflicts and disputes.In this environment,public security organs are grass-roots public power organs with both administrative and judicial attributes.Through the appropriate adjustment of laws and regulations,they can have certain powers to intervene in civil disputes to deal with the current big social contradictions and conflicts.need.Public security organs have many advantages in intervening in civil disputes,such as social identity,enhanced social stability,duality of nature in the natural institutional background,and flexibility of subject behavior.Of course,there are many problems because the current reform has not yet been carried out.In this regard,it is necessary to coordinate the balanced development of various aspects,reform the ideological and institutional aspects of the public security organs from the inside out,and at the same time promote and transform from the outside to the inside,so as to convince the people and continuously promote the reform of the public security organs.In the future,the participation of public security organs in the mediation of civil disputes will definitely be an important way to diversify the dispute resolution mechanism.But based on this,we must solve the practical problem of police deployment,and at the same time,we must further improve the moral quality and professional quality of grassroots police.It can be seen from the current mediation practice that the current laws and regulations need to be improved urgently,and the behavioral norms of the public security organs during mediation also need to be strictly controlled.This paper,by referring to foreign laws and analyzing the existing mediation problems in our country,puts forward feasible countermeasures for the public security organs to maximize the role of mediation,aiming to further strengthen the role of public security organs in civil dispute mediation,and expand The scope of civil disputes that the public security organs can mediate,and improve the diversified dispute resolution mechanism.I think the mediation work of public security organs should be able to cover most major civil disputes,including economic disputes.For this reason,the "three mountains" against public security organs intervening in economic disputes in the 1980 s and 1990 s should be abolished,and Japanese law should be used for reference.For the code of conduct of the "regional police",mediation by public security organs is adjusted as an important means in the early stage of dispute resolution,reducing the effectiveness of mediation behavior,and positioning the scope of dispute resolution as the resolution of "passionate conflicts".In terms of optimizing countermeasures,internal optimization and external adjustment should be made.While making up for the shortcomings of optimizing the public security organs that do not match the mediation mechanism,we should focus on improving the external conditions for public security organs to mediate civil disputes,so as to achieve internal and external consistency and match capabilities with conditions.The advantages of public security organs complement the disadvantages of other civil dispute resolution subjects.