| The research object of this thesis is the anthology of works by AI Nanying,a scholar in Fuzhou,Jiangxi in the late Ming dynasty.Previous scholarly research has focused on Ai Nanying’s literary theories and activities,and although his anthology has been used extensively,less attention has been paid to the anthology itself.In the 1990 s,Lin Jincai of Taiwan first combed through the editions of the anthology in his papers,and then Yin Jinming and Chen Wei.Now,on the basis of previous studies,we continue to carry out systematic research on the editions of the Collection of Tianyong Zi.This article is divided into two parts.The first part follows the traditional bibliographic approach to read,proofread,and annotate the contents of the Collection of Tianyong Zi.The text is based on the edition of the first inscription of Chongzhen and the edition of AI Weiguang,and the edition of Wang Juan of Kangxi,the edition of Zhang Fuxiang and the written by hand edition of Qing dynasty.The article contains a total of 231 articles,divided into ten volumes according to the style of Ai Wei Guang’s edition.The second part is summarizes the source,format and contents of each edition of the Collection of Tianyong Zi by the method of philology,and collates and collates the contents of the text,by using the method of social history,this paper focuses on the engravers of the Collection of Tianyong Zi,and analyzes their motivation and behavior in the light of the political and cultural environment at that time.Ten editions of the Collection of Tianyong Zi have been found,all of which still exist.These editions are the engraved edition of AI nanying in the Chongzhen reign of the Ming dynasty,the written by hand edition of Qing dynasty,the engraved edition of Wang Juan in the Kangxi reign of the Qing dynasty,the selected edition of Liu Yuzan in the Linchuan District reign of the Kangxi reign of the Qing dynasty(1664),The version of Zhang Ruhu during the reign of the Emperor Kangxi,the edition of Zhang Fuxiang in 1695,the edition of AI Weiguang in 1699,the edition of the Jiuyi Tang in1750,the edition of AI Zhou in 1836,and the edition of Rao Ruheng in 1879.The first chapter summarizes the 10 editions and their systems of transmission:Wang Juan’s edition,Zhang Fuxiang’s edition,Ai Weiguang’s edition and the written by hand edition of Qing dynasty are all derived from the edition of 1639,most of Liu Yuzan’s editions originate from Wang’s edition,while Ying Xue’s edition and Jiu Yi Tang’s edition adopt both Wang’s edition and Liu’s edition.Ai Zhou’s version is based on Ai Zhou’s version,supplemented by Zhang fu-xiang’s version,and Rao Ruheng’s version is based on Ai Zhou’s version.The second chapter is about Ai Nanying’s descendant and clan’s participation in the publication of the Collection of Tianyong Zi from the beginning of Qing dynasty to the end of Qing dynasty.Ai Nanying’s youngest son,Ai Siqi,went to Fujian province in Shunzhi years to look for AI Nanying’s coffin and her work.During the Kangxi period,Ai Nanying’s eldest grandson,AI,went to Qi Huang to ask for a letter when he wanted to engrave the Collection of Tianyong Zi.After the Daoguang period,the people who reprinted the Collection of Tianyong Zi were concentrated within the scope of clansmen and lijin.This shows the importance of bloodline and the sense of hometown in the process of document transmission.The third chapter studies Yang Yiyan’s version,Gu Jingxing’s version and Zhang Fuxiang’s version.Gu jingxing revised the Collection of Tianyong Zi because he admired ai Nanying’s moral character.Yang Yiyan respected Ai Nanying’s theory because of his family’s academic origin,thus collating the Collection of Tianyong Zi.Zhang Fu-chang was partly driven by economic interests and partly by the influence of Lv Liuliang’s admiration for Ai Nanying,so he collected Ai Nanying’s collected works for publication.The fourth chapter studies Wang Juan’s version,Liu Yuzan’s version,Ying Xue’s version and Jiu Yi Tang’s version.From the early years of Kangxi to the early years of Qianlong,because there was no clear authority to judge the content of the violation,the publishers were more strict in judging the scale of the violation than the officials who closed the forbidden books,and presents the forbidden net to weave more and more dense trend. |
