An Analysis Of "Debates On Morality" Between Analytical Marxists

The Analytical Marxists “Debates on Morality” begin with “A Tucker-Wood thesis”.By giving different answers to the question of whether Marx’s morality has contradiction.Among the Analytical Marxists,there are two different views.Some scholars think Marx is an amoral;Other scholars,on the contrary,hold that Marx has a clear moral concept and defend it.Regardless of whether Marx is seen as a moralist or an amoralist,what needs to be clear is that Marx believed that viewing social change as determined by changes in morality is a serious mistake.Therefore,in opposing the use of abstract moral principles as a guiding principle for criticizing capitalism,Marx is an amoralist.If Marx were a moralist,he would not be opposing morality itself,but rather opposing the use of morality as the basis for criticizing capitalism under the capitalist system.The perspective of non-moralist Marxists,who reject justice and morality,is exactly the opposite of that of moralist Marxists.Through a series of defenses,moralist Marxists uphold Marx’s morality.By studying the Analytical Marxists "Debates on Morality",we can understand the moral thought contained in the text of Marx,and also provide moral theoretical support for the construction of realistic Marxist political philosophy in the primary stage of socialism.Combining the core essence of Marx’s ethics with our current social morals can provide theoretical support for our current socialist morality construction and realize the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.