| The application of the sinicization theory of “cultural studies” not only raises awareness of issues due to the convergence of historical contexts,but also highlights the discourse strategies of the research subjects.As an academic group that differs from the "Literary theory school" in research methods and research interests,the "cultural research school" has become a force that cannot be ignored in the new era.As a theory advocated and advocated by the Cultural Research School,“cultural studies” is increasingly occupying(infiltrating)various fields of literary and artistic research(literary and artistic discipline research).But under this fierce development momentum,there is also a hidden crisis.This is why in the Chinese style construction of “cultural studies”,although there is a theoretical awareness and problem awareness of localized knowledge production,there is still a lack of effective practice in restoring the "historical scene" and interpreting the "current experience";The discourse system excessively pursues "identification and dialogue",lacking "reconstruction and generation based on specific historical and humanistic basis points";The exploration of the cultural ideographic characteristics and laws of the internal integration of urban and rural cultures in the process of Chinese path to modernization is not accurate enough.In addition,the application of sociological empirical methods is not effective enough,and the connection of the new development of cultural Materialism theory of classical Marxist philosophy,as well as the attention and interpretation of the "creative transformation and innovative inheritance" of local cultural experience since the new era of China,also need to continue to deepen.Fundamentally,the emergence of these issues is related to the "original intention" of“cultural studies” based on Western theory as the basis of Chinese style constructivism.The theoretical construction of “cultural studies” in the West is based on Western modernization.The use of Western modernization as the basis for the construction of the "coordinate system and construction drawings" of Chinese style “cultural studies”discourse has led to the problem of "acclimatization",reflecting the lack of depth in academic research and the weak accumulation of cultural confidence.Specifically,it is mainly reflected in the inaccurate understanding of the particularity of China’s modernization,and the lack of interpretation and research with a sense of scene and practice in the context of China’s current popular culture,which contains multiple meanings.Cultural research objects,experiences and theories,as deep issues,have been covered up in the hot debates on visualization and discourse legitimacy crisis around topics such as "Aphasia" and "rebuilding Chinese literary theory".In addition,with the help of Secularization’s definition of mass culture,the Chinese style “cultural studies” also shows a guerrilla strategy of kitsch,which often throws mass culture out of the mainstream development context of Chinese socialist literature and art,becoming a "fractured existence".These problems,as the problems existing in the transformation and construction logic of Chinese style “cultural studies”,finally point to the thinking about whether Western Marxism should be taken as the strategy of cultural deconstruction and criticism,or the classical Marxist ideology theory should be taken as the research of "systematic and general outlook" of Chinese mass culture.Based on this,"cultural poetics",as a localized theoretical construction aimed at the issue of "cultural research," has shown the potential to solve related problems through the combination of Chinese and Western theoretical construction methods and the adjustment of research objects with the times.However,how to turn potential into reality is to fully realize that "China" not only includes traditional Chinese literary theory,but also includes the relevant achievements of Chinese Marxist philosophy,especially the socialist construction... |
PDF Full Text Request