| Nowadays,the theoretical framework of reception aesthetics is changing with each passing day,and the important position of “receiving subject” seems to have been promoted to an unprecedented position.However,in the writing of specific reception history,it seems that there is still a rare history work of reception that fully transforms the perspective,penetrates into the mind course of the recipient,and discusses the “behind” of the text writing.Here,the reception of “Jin Yong” may as a specimen—— the region mainly limited to the mainland China,people among the academic field,and put the time in the New Period(1979-2000),fixed the research object,through the study of 1980 s to 1990 s.To study the criticism and the research of their writings,the ecological field behind in another angle,the text “research” germinal mechanism of concrete and get a more profound understanding.The thesis is divided into five chapters:The first chapter mainly deals with the initiation of “Study of Jin Yong” from 1979 to 1989.At this time,the “popular literature fever” basically belongs to the public,and its “fever” has not spread to the academic circle.However,behind it,behind the proposal of Zheng Chaozong and “Study of Jin Yong”,the fourth literary congress can be seen through the clouds,as well as the close collusion between national policies and the appeals of the literati;The publication of Feng Qiyong and On Jin Yong in China,followed by the change of policy in Ding Ling and Niu Han.Zhang Peiheng’s comparison between Jin Yong’s swordsman novels and Yao Xueyin’s Li Zicheng is more concerned with literature and even historiography with “people” as the outline or “class struggle” as the outline.Through combing,it can be seen that “Study of Jin Yong” from its growth,that is,with the literature of the times and even the social ecology is closely intertwined.In the second chapter,the representative promoters of “Study of Jin Yong” from 1989 to 1994 are taken as the research object.At the turn of the 1980 s and 1990 s,many scholars took academic turns,stopped their planned work and met with “Study of Jin Yong” or “xia”.Among them,Chen Pingyuan’s Ancient Literati and the Dream of Chivalrous Men is not a Jin Yong study book,but it has a deep and wide influence,and has played a role in giving this kind of research “legitimacy”.Chen Mo,as the “first scholar in Study of Jin Yong” who endured hardships,wrote six or seven monographs during this period.Later,he constantly revised and added more books,even though “today’s self is difficult to yesterday’s self”.However,Liu Su(Luo Fu)not only promoted the creation practice of Jin Yong one after another due to the coincidence of chance,but also prompted him to write the very famous “self-statement of the writer” in 1966,which was close to self-talk,and made him gradually participate in the “selfimage shaping” in the later period.Also,matchmaking,finally make Jin Yong’s works in the Joint Publishing Company as the “complete works”.This kind of osmotic work may seem to “smooth things”,but for the academic acceptance,it is far-reaching.In short,during this period,“Study of Jin Yong” definitely got the substantial promotion.The third chapter mainly deals with the hot issues from 1994 to 1998,as well as the targeted publications that serve as the accepted “front” for the academic and intellectual communities.Wang Yichuan listed Jin Yong as the fourth in The Novel Volume of the 20 th Century Chinese Literature Master Library.Looking back on his academic career,it can be seen that he deliberately caught people’s attention,took the opportunity to “challenge” and showed his “academic ambition”.Behind Yan Jiayan and his A Quiet Literary Revolution,there are also some hidden motives and arrangements for the return of Hong Kong to the state.Popular Literature Review was founded in 1992,and ended in 1998,during which the “Study of Jin Yong”,has occupied half,apart from the “Jin Yong’s special issue” in 1997,and there are plenty of seminar about Jin Yong on academic papers,here publishes “simultaneous corresponding” trend is shown,if you try to salvage the “story”,also can be seen in the 90’s,even the “popular literature” in the academic,journal also has involved between the market and constantly,both lean on their support,and the complex relationship of stumbles.The fourth chapter focuses on the sudden expansion of the “Study of Jin Yong”(1998-2000),this time in the United States,Taiwan,Beijing,for example,a three “Study of Jin Yong” conferences were hold in Colorado.And the conference convener Liu Zaifu as example,analyzes the related “conferences” off the court,in order to see our journey behind the participant and review;And Yuan Liangjun,He Manzi,Wang Binbin the three for mainland academic circles and even the whole “Jin Yong Fever” criticism on behalf of the scholar,is more like a two big tradition,“new literature” of traditional and classical literature tradition(the latter in modem generalization into “the mandarin duck butterfly” and the traditional “chivalrous case-solving” to a certain extent)—the most,with the present of condensation on “Jin Yong”.And at the end of the millennium hot issues,“the Quarrel of Jin and Wang”,seemingly by Wang Shuo,a scene,but under the push of the media,has increasingly become a “all firewood flame high”,even if the criticism of “true”,is also under the cacophony in submerged intangible,coming millennium anxiety,the radiating surface spread to every individual of cultural and media.Here,the research and criticism of Jin Yong become a kind of “representation”,which is worthy of in-depth study.The fifth chapter,Jin Yong’s research and criticism of the 20 years as a whole look back and summarize,refine “with position without work”,“a position less work”,“no position works” and so on several kind of common of Jin Yong’s related criticism,and review,and points out that in the following four aspects—back to the literary text,back to the real considerate writers “Reflection of Life” state of mind and life course,back to the intertextuality,back to the real derivative works based on Jin Yong’s works,perhaps can be used as a new academic point,in the 21 st century to dig and dig further. |
PDF Full Text Request