Research On The Plaintiff’s Subject System In Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation

Since the implementation of China’s reform and opening up 40 years ago,China’s economic and social development has made great achievements that have attracted global attention,but the contradiction between resource and environmental tension and economic development has become increasingly prominent,and the ecological imbalance has become increasingly serious,which is seriously affecting the green development of our society.Therefore,the maintenance and improvement of our ecological environment has become very important,and the situation is very urgent.The environmental civil public interest litigation system is an effective way to maintain and protect ecological health,and has made great contributions to promoting the construction of ecological and environmental rule of law in China.Among them,the plaintiff’s subject system is particularly important and plays an irreplaceable role.The establishment of a clear plaintiff subject system is the basis for environmental civil public interest litigation in China,but the laws and regulations in this regard have not been fully implemented and improved.For example,the scope of the plaintiff’s subject matter is not clear;The legal basis for the right of administrative agencies to initiate environmental civil public interest lawsuits is insufficient;There are too many restrictions on the prosecution of social organizations;The exercise of the powers of the procuratorate is severely restricted;There is a lack of a clear order of prosecution for each entity.These problems hinder the protection of public environmental interests in environmental civil public interest litigation.In order to better play the role of public interest litigation,through the study of actual cases and the continuous exploration of public interest litigation theory,this paper conducts research on the qualification and ranking of plaintiffs from the perspective of environmental civil public interest litigation,during which the connotation of this system,the type of plaintiff subject and the value of the system are discussed,on this basis,the operating effect of the system is summarized,many problems are pointed out,and several countries of great significance in the field of environmental civil public interest protection law are deeply studied According to the refinement of its system and the desirability of the test,the formation of ideas that can guide the progress of similar systems in China,and then comprehensively considering the domestic and foreign experience and the actual situation of the country,a series of improvement suggestions that are conducive to improving the existing problems are put forward.