Heilongjiang Province 2021 Sports College Entrance Examination New Scoring Standard Identity Research

As an important talent selection examination in China's college entrance examination,its importance is irreplaceable in the current situation,while the technical examination in physical education college entrance examination,as an important part of the college entrance examination,is also irreplaceable and reflects the fairness,impartiality and scientificity of the college entrance examination.The original intention of the reform is for better development.Whether the new examination contents and grading standards are scientific and reasonable or whether they can be unanimously recognized by candidates,coaches and university teachers is an important issue.The factors that affect the identity of candidates,coaches and university teachers are mainly reflected in many aspects,such as whether there is an imbalance of difficulty between test items and whether there is an imbalance of difficulty between men and women.In order to explore the identity of the new sports college entrance examination scoring standard and its influencing factors,we read,classify and sort out the books and documents related to the sports entrance examination,and know the latest trends of the current sports college entrance examination.Through questionnaires,interviews and other methods,we investigated some candidates,coaches and college teachers who took the technical examination in 2021,sorted out the statistical information by Excel software,and analyzed the sorted data by SPSS software.Taking the identity of the "standard" as the research object,we drew the following research conclusions:(1)Most candidates,coaches and college teachers agree with the content of the current technical examination,and the main reason that affects their agreement is the difference in difficulty between men and women in the project and the difference in difficulty between the examination items.(2)Most candidates,coaches and college teachers have a high sense of identity with the 100-meter event,and the main influencing factors for their disapproval are the excessive standard of full marks and the unreasonable setting of scoring intervals.(3)Most candidates,coaches and college teachers agree with the second-level frog leaping.The main reason for their disapproval is that it is simpler than other events and the setting of scoring interval is unreasonable.(4)Most candidates,coaches and college teachers disapprove of in-situ shot put.The main reason for disapproving is that it is more difficult than other events and there are differences between men and women in difficulty.(5)Most candidates,coaches and college teachers disapprove of 800 meters.The main reason for disapproval is that the grading interval is unreasonable and it is difficult compared with other events.It is suggested to appropriately reduce the difficulty of in-situ shot put for men and women;Reduce the full score standard of 800-meter running and formulate the scoring standard suitable for candidates in Heilongjiang area;Improve the difficulty of the second-level frog jump and refine the scoring standard of the second-level frog jump;Adjust the 100-meter scoring standard to make the overall scoring interval reach a certain gradient,refine the men's scoring standard to make it have the same distinction as the women's 100-meter scoring standard,and achieve a relative balance between men's and women's events,so as to enhance the identity of candidates,coaches and college teachers to the new scoring standard of college entrance examination.