From 2013 To 2015,Chongqing Sports College Entrance Examination Badminton Special Examinee Achievement Analysis And Research

Sports college entrance examination admission test in chongqing since 1997,during the period has experienced two major changes.One is in 2004,up from before 2004 special quality test mode instead of the five quality model.Before another is in 2012 by five quality mode again instead of the special and quality model.Criteria for the 1989 regular institutions of higher learning sports specialized recruitment of students test criteria and methods,combines the actual conditions of chongqing,again to modify the part as a criteria for the sports college entrance examination.But today,many of the original standard no longer applies to this era of examinee,so it is necessary to analyze the sports college entrance examination achievement in recent years,chongqing and research,find out the deficiencies in scoring criteria.In this paper,the badminton specialized examinee,for example,badminton special test criteria for the analysis and research,and probes into the unreasonable place.This study through the literature material method,mathematical statistics and expert interview method,to 2013,2014 and 2015,three years of sports badminton special examinee college entrance examination achievement data has carried on the comparative analysis and research.Results show that the poor condition of the distribution of scores in three years reveals that there are many flaws in sports college entrance examination.And aimed at these problems put forward own revision opinion.The conclusions are as follows:(1)from the data,and compared with the college entrance examination line.Whether it is the score of the special project or the score of the physical quality,the average of the results is low.However,the dynamic analysis of the overall special performance,the number of good candidates is more,all showed different degrees of left skewed distribution.There are two reasons for this phenomenon,one is those who own ability,including training time increase,training equipment,methods,means of improving and so on;on the other hand,standard for evaluation test project is not reasonable.(2)from 2013 to 2015,the overall achievement distribution of badminton candidates was basically the same as that of male and female students.And have their own advantages of the project,the girls in the 2013 special total score,backcourt lob,100 meters(at 0.05 level),800 meters,100 meters in 2014(at 0.05 level),standing long jump,100 meters in 2015(at 0.05 level)and standing long jump is better than boys;the boys in the net before 2013,the ball solid ball throwing,2014,the net backcourt lofty ball,the ball 800 meters,the 2015 special total score,backcourt lob,Gao Yuanqiu,author and former backcourt 800 meters and other projects are better than the girls.In 2013 the standing long jump,throwing solid ball 2014 special total score,backcourt lob,solid ball throwing and 2015 of these projects,the performance of girls is better than boys,but boys better than girls in performance stability.(3)the overall achievement of the special test items is on the high side.2013-2015 badminton candidates special test items,the candidates for high performance group candidates more(left skewed),and more than the number of candidates for the main line of only 18 people,significantly less.(4)the score distribution of physical fitness test items is skewed distribution.From 2013 to 2015,the examinee's physical fitness test items showed that the scores of the candidates showed a high number of groups(left skewed),that is,the number of candidates in the high score group was more.According to the above conclusion,put forward the following suggestions:(1)male and female candidates should strengthen targeted training their own weak project,boys should pay attention to 100 meters and so on project training,while girls should strengthen exercises before kick net and so on.(2)revise and perfect the scoring standard of test items.The scoring criteria for all items required for the badminton special candidates need to be adjusted and modified.How to modify and modify the scale should be studied further.The purpose of this paper is to reveal the test dynamic situation of Chongqing sports college entrance examination in the past 2013-2015 years through the form of data analysis,and to find out the unreasonable points of the sports entrance examination scoring standards.Put forward some improvement measures,such as adjustment of standard for evaluation of test items,test items or increase the difficulty level,in order to enhance the rationality of sports college entrance examination standard for evaluation,to test the equality of men and women.Thus,better for the sports college entrance examination services,reflecting the higher the level of movement,the greater the difficulty,each increase in the performance of a unit will increase the higher the value of the principle.