The Evolution Of Australia's Competitive Neutrality Regime: Controversies And Implications

Although competitive neutrality has been used by the United States in recent years as a tool of trade protectionism and one of the weapons for launching trade wars,it is undeniable that as the basic principle of government intervention in the market and the principle of exercise of power,competitive neutrality has different meanings to a country’s domestic market.Twenty-five years ago,Australia created competitive neutrality.Its original meaning was to require government-owned commercial activities not to enjoy a net competitive advantage due to their ownership advantages.Competitive neutrality began with the development of Australian competition laws and microeconomic reforms.It has been continuously improved in the tide of Australia’s national competition policy reforms,and it is also conducting self-examination and innovation under the new vision of the country’s industrial transformation and development.Over the years of development,competition neutrality has gone from a competitive term in an investigation report to a national competition policy regulation,and finally a relatively sound system of competition neutrality has been formed.Together with other competition policies,it has played an important role in promoting the establishment of good market competition and fair trade order in Australia.At the same time,this creation also makes Australia a representative country that has established a comprehensive competitive neutral system framework;it is no exaggeration to say that a history of competition neutrality in the form of domestic law is actually an Australian competition neutrality reform history.Although Australia’s competitive neutrality system established in the 1990 s is indeed at the forefront of the world,in recent years,domestic academic circles seem to have more calls for learning from the Australian competitive neutral system framework to guide the reform of state-owned enterprises.However,any system All are alive,not a stagnant pool.Australia’s competition neutrality system has been in a dynamic process of development since its birth.This can be seen from the overall practice of the competition neutral system and the enforcement of AGCNCO’s competition neutrality complaints.That is to say,the current Australian competition neutrality system is a constantly changing competition policy,and in the development process,what is presented to the world is a competition neutral system that coexists with pros and cons.The thinking on the evolution and enlightenment of Australia’s competitive neutrality system is also derived from this.Through the investigation of the evolution path of Australia’s competition neutrality system,the following two problems can be solved.On the one hand,it will examine the overall implementation effect of Australia’s competition neutrality system based on the actual situation and the effect of law enforcement,and try to find the disputed points.In order to clarify some academic doubts,and try to update and improve the understanding of Australia’s competitive neutrality system.On the other hand,based on the imperfect market system,excessive government intervention,and inadequate supervision that need to be addressed in deepening reforms in our country,this paper discusses the top level of competition neutrality from the perspective of my country’s national conditions from the perspective of reviewing the enlightenment of the implementation of the competition neutral system.Design and application path.The competitive neutrality system,as an "imported product",has an important reference role for the construction of the rule of law system in my country’s market economy.However,if my country wants to establish a localized competition neutral system,it will inevitably be unable to break away from the specific legal system and economic environment.Only by comparing the application environment of the Chinese and Australian systems can we design a system that not only fits the core purpose of Australia’s competition neutral system,but also meets my country’s national conditions.The content of the competition neutral system.Therefore,our country should form a localized competitive neutral system with the regulation of government intervention in the market as the core and ensuring fair competition between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises in the market.The specific application path of the system should also be established from the perspective of constructing the relevant legal policy system,improving the implementation mechanism,and propagating and promoting the plan.