Clinical Observation Of Blood Flow Restriction Training Combined With Taping In The Treatment Of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Objective: Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome(PFPS)incidence is high and the prevalence is wide,and there is a popular range,which is one of the most common injuries of knee joints.Studies have shown that four-headed muscle trains are effective,but many PFPS patients have unable to conduct traditional large strength high-load strength training relative to the pain intervention in traditional ways.In this study,blood flow restrictions were added to the traditional training method,and combined with patch therapy,explored the efficacy of PFPS to provide a more efficient solution for motion intervention in clinical applications.Methods: A total of 48 PFPS patients who were treated in the Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Affiliated Hospital of our school from August 2020 to January 2021 were selected and randomly divided into a simple knee extension resistance group(n=16),combined with knee extension resistance training The sticking group(control group,n=16),blood flow restriction training combined with sticking group(test group,n=16),were intervened 3 times a week for 6 weeks.After 6 weeks,the vision of each group was counted.Pain scale(Visual Analogy Scale,VAS)data,Lysholm knee joint scale data,thigh circumference,isokinetic muscle strength test data.Results:1.Comparison of VAS score groups: After 3 weeks and 6 weeks of simple knee extension resistance group intervene,the numerical significance is reduced(p(27)0.05);the difference in the intervention of the intervention in the control group has statistically significant,and the intervention is significant.Reduce(p(27)0.05);Test Group intervene 3weeks and 6 weeks,the numerical decreases(p(27)0.05).There was no significant difference in the first three groups of intervention(p>0.05),and the difference between the three groups of intervention was statistically significant(p(27)0.05).Two-two comparison between the post-intervention group showed that the value of the control group was significantly lower than the simple knee extension resistance group(p(27)0.05),and the numerical significance of the test group was reduced(p(27)0.01);the numerical value of the test group compared to the control group Reduce(p(27)0.05).2.Comparison of the Lysholm score group showed that the three groups were intervened 3weeks and 6 weeks,and the numerical significance increased(p(27)0.05).Inter-group comparison: There is no statistically significant difference between the three groups of intervention(p>0.05),and the difference between the three groups of intervention has statistically significant(p(27)0.05).The data between the subsequent subsequent data is compared with the simple knee extension resistance group,and the value of the control group increased significantly(p(27)0.05),and the numerical significance of the test group increased(p(27)0.01);compared with the control group,the test group Numerical significance increases(p(27)0.05).3.Compared with respect to peak torque groups: three groups of intervention 3 weeks and 6weeks,the numerical significance increases(p(27)0.05).Inter-group comparison: There is no statistically significant difference between the three groups of intervention(p>0.05),and the difference between the three groups of intervention has statistically significant(p(27)0.05).The data between the subsequent subsequent data is compared with the simple knee extension resistance group,and the value of the control group increased significantly(p(27)0.05),and the numerical significance of the test group increased(p(27)0.01);compared with the control group,the test group Numerical significance increases(p(27)0.05).Contrast display in the thighs: 3 weeks and 6 weeks of intervention in three groups(p(27)0.05).Comparison between groups: There is no statistical significance in the first three groups of intervention(p>0.05).The data between the subsequent subsequent data is compared with the simple knee extension resistance group,and the value of the control group increased significantly(p(27)0.05),and the numerical significance of the test group increased(p(27)0.01);compared with the control group,the test group Numerical significance increases(p(27)0.05).Conclusion:(1)Simple knee extension resistance training and knee extension resistance training combined with taping can enhance the knee extension muscle strength of patients with PFPS and relieve their pain symptoms;(2)Blood flow restriction training combined with taping not only significantly enhances knee extension muscle strength,Increasing the circumference of the thigh can also significantly relieve the pain symptoms and improve the mobility of the knee joint.In the clinical treatment of PFPS,for people who are unable to perform high-intensity strength training due to pain,blood flow restriction training combined with sticking has a small load and good curative effect.