| Judging from the qualifying match of this Olympic Games,although the Chinese women’s basketball team’s forward players play commendably,there is still a big gap with the world-class strong teams.The forwards of many first-class strong teams are often the core of the team’s attack and defense,while the Chinese team members can’t find specific attack points in the game.There is still a gap between the attack and defense ends and the world-class strong teams,which is also our weakness,Therefore,analyzing the differences in attack and defense ability between the Chinese team and the opponent’s forward players,finding out the deficiencies and gaps,and putting forward targeted opinions are conducive to further improve the overall strength of the Chinese women’s basketball team and narrow the gap with the world-class strong team.In order to explore the gap between the offensive and defensive ability of the Chinese women’s basketball team and the opponent’s forward in the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games,this paper uses the combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods to further explore the offensive and defensive ability of the Chinese women’s basketball team and its opponent’s forward position,and tries to put forward development suggestions,so as to provide some theoretical guidance and reference for basketball teaching in the future.The research results are as follows:1)There are two Chinese teams in the top ten in terms of attack ability,the third and the seventh respectively;Australia has two places,the 4th and 8th respectively;Puerto Rico has no players in the top 10;Belgium ranked first,sixth and ninth in the top ten;Serbia also has only two places,ranking second and fifth.2)The defensive indexes of Chinese team forwards Shao Ting,Zhang Ru,pan Zhenqi and Huang Sijing are 7,16,8 and 13 respectively.There are two players in the top10,Shao ting and pan Zhenqi respectively,while Australia has three players in the top 10;There are two players from Puerto Rico,two players from Belgium and only one player from the first ranked Serbian team.3)Chinese team forwards Shao Ting,Zhang Ru,pan Zhenqi and Huang Sijing ranked 2,19,6 and 15 respectively.There are two players in the top 10,Shao ting and pan Zhenqi respectively,while Australia has three players in the top 10;There are no players from Puerto Rico,two players from Belgium and two players from the first ranked Serbian team.The conclusions are as follows:1)The average age of the Chinese team’s front ranks second among the five teams.The Chinese team’s front has abundant physical fitness and strong mobility in the game.2)Although there is no significant difference in scoring ability between the Chinese team’s frontline players and other teams,Shao ting and pan Zhenqi also have a certain gap in assists and offensive rebounds with topsis-rsr ranking A-class excellent frontline players misman and brooks.3)The Chinese team’s enthusiasm for rebounding in the backcourt is not high;The steals are excellent,especially the Chinese player Shao Ting’s steals ability is among the best;The blocking ability is not excellent,which can not effectively interfere with the shooting of offensive players;However,the ability to control fouls is excellent,which can effectively deter offensive players.4)Through topsis-rsr analysis,it is concluded that the performance of the Chinese team’s forward players in this world series is still commendable,but it is still insufficient to compete with the world’s strong teams.They only won the fifth place and have a lot of room for progress.The athletes’ lack of control over the details of the attack is the reason for the failure of successive mistakes at the critical moment of the fourth quarter against Serbia. |
