A Comparative Study On The Offensive Effects Of Players From Different Positions Between The Chinese Team And The Top Four Teams In The 2019 Basketball World Cup

FIBA Basketball World Cup(FIBA Basketball World Cup)referred to as "Basketball World Cup" is the world’s highest level national team basketball tournament hosted by the International Basketball Federation(abbreviated as "FIBA"),held every four years.The predecessor of the Basketball World Cup was the World Men’s Basketball Championship held in 1950.On January 28,2012,the International Basketball Federation announced that the Men’s Basketball World Championship was renamed the Basketball World Cup.Since the 8th Men’s Basketball World Championship in 1978,the Chinese team has participated in all the Men’s Basketball World Championships and the Basketball World Cup,with the exception of the 13 th Men’s Basketball World Championship in 1998 and the first Basketball World Cup in2014.Its best results are In the top eight,the 2019 Basketball World Cup was held in China.The Chinese team finally missed the Tokyo Olympics in 24 th place.Therefore,a comparative study on the offensive effects of the Chinese team in the 2019 Basketball World Cup and the top four teams in different positions It has important meaning and reference value.This article takes the age,height,weight,Quetelet index and offensive effect indicators of the Chinese team in the 2019 Basketball World Cup and the top four teams in different positions as the research object,through the method of literature data,expert interviews,and video observation methods.,Mathematical statistical method and logical analysis method to compare the age,height,weight,Quetelet index and various indicators of offensive effect between the Chinese team in the 2019 Basketball World Cup and the top four teams in different positions,so as to compare the Chinese team The various indicators of age,physical shape and offensive effect of players in different positions and the strengths and weaknesses of the top four teams,and put forward relevant suggestions for the problems of the Chinese team in various positions,and selected and selected Chinese men’s basketball players.The improvement of the overall level provides a theoretical reference basis.Research indicates:(1)Compared with the semi-finals,from the perspective of age,the Chinese guards have significant differences with Spain and Australia guards(p<0.05),while the forwards and center players have no significant differences with the semi-finals(p>0.05).(2)Compared with the semi-finals,in terms of physical appearance,there is no significant difference between the Chinese team and the semi-finals in terms of height and weight of forwards,defenders,and centers(p>0.05);from the Quetelet index,the Chinese defenders There is no significant difference between the Quetelet index of the forward and the top four teams(p>0.05),and the index of the Chinese forward Quetelet has no significant difference compared with Spain and Argentina(p>0.05).(3)Judging from the offensive effect of guard players,there is no significant difference in scoring indicators between the Chinese team and the semi-finals in terms of guard players(p>0.05);the Chinese team and the semi-finals have averaged rebounds,assists,turnovers,and infringements per game.There is no significant difference in the number of regulations(p>0.05);there is no significant difference in offensive efficiency compared with the top four teams(p>0.05).(4)From the perspective of the attacking effect of the forward players,there is no significant difference between the average points per game and the average field goal percentage of the forward players of the Chinese team and the semi-finals(p>0.05);the average number of shots per game and the number of hits per game are significantly different from that of Argentina(P<0.05);Chinese team striker and the four teams two points several shots,two hits,two-point shooting,three-point shots,three hits,three hits,averaging the number of free throws,free throw rate did not differ significantly(p > 0.05),the average number of free throws per game is significantly different from that of the Argentina team(p < 0.05);there is no significant difference between the Chinese team and the semi-final forwards in the field of rebounds,assists and turnovers per game(p>0.05);There is a significant difference between the violated rules and Argentina(p<0.05);the offensive efficiency is not significantly different from that of the top four teams(p>0.05).Analysis conclusions:(1)From the perspective of age,it can be seen that the Chinese team is younger than the top four teams in the positions of defenders,forwards,and centers.The players have the problems of inexperience in the competition and lack of psychological resistance;(2)From the physical aspect,it can be seen that the height and weight of the Chinese team’s defenders and forwards are lower than the players in the corresponding positions of the semi-finals.Although the center players have a height advantage,they are underweight.The Chinese team players are physically strong.Insufficient degree and insufficient confrontation ability.(3)From the aspect of scoring ability,it can be seen that the number of shots of the guards is not proportional to the hit rate,and the scoring efficiency is low;the forward players have fewer shots and the hit rate is low,especially the lack of three-point long-range shooting ability;and the center players average shots per game.,There are many free throws,but the shooting rate is not high.It can be seen that the shooting stability of the center players needs to be improved.(4)Compared with the semi-finals,the Chinese team’s defenders are more active in grabbing offensive rebounds and have a certain ability to control turnovers,but the number of assists sent out is small;the forward players have insufficient offensive ability and compete for the frontcourt.The enthusiasm of rebounding is not high.Both forwards and defenders of the Chinese team have problems of fouling experience and insufficient offensive aggression;center players are active in grabbing frontcourt rebounds,have strong fouling ability under the basket,are aggressive,but have insufficient ability to control mistakes.(5)The Chinese team’s forward talents are insufficient,and there is an imbalance in the personal abilities of internal and external players.The lack of substitute players’ ability leads to passive lineup rotation,single play style,low free throw shooting rate and lack of long-range shooting ability.These are all urgently needed for the Chinese basketball team to solve.problem.