Township financial management is an important part of local government financial management.It is not only an important basis to promote the implementation of township government’s financial functions,but also can effectively promote the harmoniously developing of economic construction and social undertakings in rural areas.In recent years,with the integration of urban and rural development and the acceleration of the new rural construction project,the role of township finance has also undergone major changes,shouldering more responsibilities.The township financial talent team is the strength of township financial work.The management concept and working attitude of township finance must be implemented by a corresponding financial talent team.Therefore,only by improving the comprehensive quality of the financial talent team,can we meet the needs of the new situation and new tasks,give better play to the function of finance,and create a new chapter in the work of township finance.Based on the foundation and theory of public management,this paper fully investigates the current situation of the construction and development of township financial talent team in S County,combined with many relevant literature at home and abroad,and learn from the successful experience of domestic advanced towns in the construction of financial talent team,and deeply analyzes the problems existing in the construction of township financial talent team in S County.According to the actual situation of S County,this paper puts forward the feasible countermeasures to promote the construction of township financial talent team in S County,to quicken the step of deepening reform and self-development of towns in S County,and provide reference for other towns too.The research shows that the construction of township financial talent team in S county has been gradually strengthened,but it still can not meet the needs of the rapid economic development and modern financial system of S County.The main problems are: unreasonable talent structure,lack of new forces;weak training,low professional level;lack of Ideological and political learning,weak legal awareness;lack of industry standards,incomplete assessment mechanism;weak incentive mechanism,limited development prospects,etc. |