In recent years,the rapid development of the national economy and the adjustment of the industrial structure have become the inevitable trend of current economic and social development.Combined with the actual development of government departments in various regions,local governments have strengthened the establishment of government industrial policy guidance funds,and related supporting policies of the government’s industrial policy guidance funds have also been gradually introduced.Under the macroscopic guidance of government departments,the number and scale of government’s industrial policy guidance funds have been expanded.The accumulation of government funds and private capital has enabled the development of industrial economy in all regions to have stronger financial guarantees.At present,countries such as the United States and Israel have adopted government industrial policy guidance funds to attract large amounts of social capital,promote the adjustment of local industries,and have a high degree of industrial innovation,which has brought new guarantees for local economic development and social stability.The mature operating model provides a reference for the development of government industrial policy guidance funds.In light of the current development,although the first-line economically developed regions such as Beijing and Shanghai have achieved vigorous development of government industrial policy guidance funds,the operation of government-oriented industrial policy guidance funds in some regions is still limited.Comprehensively comparing the problems and causes of the development model of the government’s industrial policy guidance funds,obtaining the improvement measures and policy suggestions for the development of the government’s industrial policy guidance funds are the focus of this study.This article is divided into four parts.The first part is the introduction part.In addition to clarifying the research background,research purpose and research significance of this study,it also summarizes the research status quo at home and abroad,and outlines the concept definition and operation mode of government industrial policy guidance funds.The second part is the analysis of the development status of the government industry-guided funds.A comprehensive analysis of the development status of government industry-guided funds is carried out in Beijing,Shanghai,and Tianjin.The actual analysis includes the fund summary,management agency conditions,and government responsibilities.Investment positioning and so on.The third part is the analysis of the problems and causes of the development of government industrial policy guidance funds.The problems in the development of government-guided funds include the unclear subject of industry guidance funds,unclear entrusted agency policies,limited feedback on policy evaluation,and no policy guarantee for fund withdrawal.Wait.The fundamental reason for this is that the main reason for the development of government-guided funds is mainly due to the inadequacy of the capacity of government policy bodies,the relative lag in fund agency policies,and the lack of necessary performance appraisal for fund development policies,and the lack of admission and withdrawal policies for funds..The fourth part is the reference and optimization countermeasures of the government-led funds of developed countries.From the American Small Business Investment Company Plan,the Israeli Yozma Project and the Australian Innovative Investment Funds Program,it is pointed out that in the later stages of development,it is necessary to strengthen the main body of government policies and improve the entrusted agency management.The policy system,through the formation of a professional and standardized investment performance appraisal supporting system,introduced innovative investment fund entry and exit policies,and truly achieved the steady development of government-led funds. |