Research On The Loss Of Publicity In Purchase Of Service Contracting

This article first based on the previous people’s serious summary and reference of research results on related topics such as publicity and government purchases of public services from social organizations,re-examine the concept of the publicity of government purchases of public services from social organizations and point out the performance of its loss;second,through Combing the core ideas and core elements of the government failure theory,and combining the applicability of the practice of purchasing services,the three logics of its public loss are proposed: power logic,decision logic,and process logic.The article takes Y town in Chengdu W district as the case study object,obtains relevant information through in-depth interviews,direct observation and participation observation,etc.It deeply analyzes the practice process of the Y town government purchasing various service projects from various social organizations in the area.The study found that purchasing services shaped the“trinity” body composition.In the power structure generated based on this body composition change,three kinds of tensions were potentially formed.These three kinds of tensions are used in the decision-making and execution of purchase practice decisions.In the process,due to the impact of subjective and objective factors such as difficulty in identifying service needs,insufficient information,lack of public participation,lack of competition,and lack of supervision,the government’s self-interest,social organization’s profitability,and citizens’ irrationality have led to such as supply and demand deviations.3.Insufficient social responsiveness;lack of purchasing procedures,oversight of regulatory assessments,randomization of social organization project application and acceptance,and quality decline in service production.Based on the findings,the article proposes to promote cooperation between government and society and Suggestions to ensure the effectiveness of the purchase of services to promote the return of publicity: take publicity as the value orientation,take public responsibility as the position of responsibility,use the equal and interactive relationship between government and society as the service network,and take public participation as the mechanism guarantee.Compared with the related research in the academic circles,this article continues and connects the views of scholars such as Liu Zhihui and Yang Shuwen,that the publicity of the government’s purchase of social organization services is a composite publicity,which overlaps and merges the publicity of the government and social organizations.And further believes that public regulations that take regulatory documents as the main carrier,such as laws,regulations and policies related to the government ’s purchase of social organization services,shape and clarify the requirements of publicity.These policy texts and regulatory documents All clearly point to public organizations and their behaviors,so that the understanding of publicity no longer stays at the level of vague abstraction.Third,the loss of publicity in the practice of purchasing services is due to the three powers formed during the government ’s purchase process.In the decision-making and implementation of tension,due to the impact of subjective and objective factors such as difficulty in identifying public service needs,insufficient information,lack of public participation,lack of competition,and lack of supervision,it has shown the self-interest of the government,the profitability of social organizations,and Citizens’ irrationality,etc.,and thus induced many phenomena leading to the loss of publicity.In addition,in the case empirical part,the article tries to have a dialogue with the scholars’ rich case studies to enhance the external validity of the case selected by the article.