The Comparison Berween The Two Governments Of Obama And Trump On The Dprk Policy

After Trump came to power,he abandoned the "strategic patience"policy in the period of the Obama administration,adopted the " Maximu m pressure 〃 policy and placed the Korean issue priority in the forei gn affairs.Compared with the Obama administration that negatively re sponded to the North Korean nuclear issue,the new US government soug ht a more active and active way to solve the escalating Peninsula cri sis.Obama’ s policy towards North Korea not only failed to achieve it s stated goals,but made Korea’ s nuclear technology in the 8 years ah ead.The Trump administration,through diplomatic isolation,deepenin g sanctions and strengthening military operations,forced North Korea to abandon its nuclear power and lay a foundation for bilateral cont acts.In this context,this article is written by the Trump administr ation to implement the " Maximum pressure" policy of 1st anniversary,and the Obama administration’ s "strategic patience" policy has also been terminated.We can make a comprehensive analysis of the two gove rnment’ s policy towards North Korea.Starting with the macro American Asia Pacific strategy,the article makes a comparison of the causes,orientation and development process of the two government Asia Pacif ic strategy,and thinks that the unformed Asia Pacific strategy of th e Trump administration has retained the two means of military deterre nce and regional problems in the"Asia Pacific rebalance" strategy in the Obama period.Taking“the priority of the United States”as the guiding ideology,we are increasingly interested in economic and trad e alliances,cognition and so on.The two government formulated its r espective policies towards the DPRK under different Asian and Pacific strategic frameworks.After comparing the two government policies of Obama and Trump,t his paper thinks that both "strategic patience" and " Maximum pressure" are the key components of the Asia Pacific strategy.In the period of Obama,under the strategy of "rebalancing Asia Pacific rebalance",although the policy of"strategic patience" was not reached the init ial goal of the policy,the United States made use of the Korean issu e to consolidate the U.S.-Japan Alliance,U.S.-ROK alliance,the United States,Japan and South Korea made progress in military coordination and intelligence sharing,and the deployment of the "THAAD" system a lso made the United States The system of excessive antimissile is bec oming more and more perfect."Strategic patience" can be said to be a failure of strategic success policy.The Trump administration is fac ing more serious problems in Korea.Four aspects of the " Maximum pres sure 〃 policy can be regarded as an upgraded version of the"strategi c patience" element of the Obama administration.In the determination of sanctions and military threats,the policy is actively seeking wa ys to improve the relations between the two countries.Main features.In a word,the two government has selectively changed the policy tow ards the DPRK in the direction of the overall strategic adjustment of the Asia Pacific strategy,but the basic goal is the same-the purs uit of the denuclearization of the peninsula at the same time hinders or delays the development of China.At present,the situation of the peninsula is beginning to dawn.Facing the new government’ s policy o n the North Korea,China should actively promote the Chinese initiati ve.At the same time,under the communication and cooperation between China and the United States,we should reshape the multilateral nego tiation mechanism and bring the Northeast Asia back to peace and deve lopment.