| Chen Huan,Hu Chenggong and Ma Ruichen are known as the "Three Masters of MAO’s Poetry Research In The Qing Dynasty",among which,Although Chen Huan and Hu Chenggong have great commonalities in poetic concepts and poetry methods,there are still some differences in the content and writing style of the specific annotations of "The Book of Songs".At present,most of the research on the comparison between the two and the works of the two are based on general theory,and lack of specific and in-depth language,lack of in-depth works,and insufficient breadth.This article intends to use the method of comparative research to make a comprehensive comparison between Chen Huan’s "Zhuan Shu" and Hu Chengyu’s "Hou Jian",focusing on comparing the similarities and differences in their "Poetry" studies.The works are placed under the background of the study of "Poetry" in the Qing Dynasty,exploring the reasons for the similarities and differences in their creation,and on top of the existing research results of the predecessors,and strive to contribute to the study of "Mao’s Poetry" in the Qing Dynasty.This paper is divided into six parts:The introduction part is a summary of previous related research,mainly showing the purpose and significance of the article research,as well as the supplement and innovation of this article to the previous research.The first chapter mainly discusses the origin of the two academic thoughts under the academic background of Qianjia and Jiaqing.With the two people’s mutual communication as the starting point,through combing the academic interactions between scholars in Beijing,the academic circles at that time explored the "Poetry" fashion in the academic circles at that time.It is found in the collections and letters that the two have conducted detailed discussions on various issues in the "The Book of Songs",showing the mutual influence of academic exchanges on their philosophy of governing "The Book of Songs".The second chapter is divided into three sections,starting with the purpose and writing process of Chen Huan and Hu Chenggong,to compare the concepts,principles and writing styles of "Chuanshu" and "Houjian" in their interpretation of "Shi",and to highlight their different degrees of compliance with the scriptures,"Shi Mao Shi Zhuan Shu" and "Mao Shi Hou Jian".In terms of the style of writing,Chen Huan absorbed Duan Yucai’s annotation and mainly interpreted the biography of Mao,while Hu Chenggong chose the style of reading notes with entries,and only made new entries when he had different opinions.The third chapter is divided into three sections to compare Chen Huan’s and Hu Cheng-gong’s different attitudes towards the poems of their predecessors.Chen Huan rejected the three poems,while Hu Cheng-gong was able to objectively reject the three poems.Chen Huan only regarded Zheng Jian as a tool for relieving Mao’s biography,but in Hu Chengzhi’s system,Zheng Jian was regarded as one of the objects of his poem.At the same time,both of them abandoned Song but obey the han.The third section of this chapter mainly analyzes this phenomenon.In general,hu was able to absorb his family’s views while Chen Huan followed Mao’s lead.The fourth chapter mainly discusses the achievements and shortcomings of the two writers and discusses the important position of the two in the history of the study of the "poems" through the comments of the later generations on the "biography of Mao Shi" and "Mao Shi Hou Jian" and their influence on the study of the later "Mao Shi".The last part mainly discusses the different achievements of the two books in the field of "Mao Poems",and makes a simple summary of the whole text. |