On Backtracking Of Acceptance,Interpretation About Wang Changling’s “San Jing” And Re-exploration In The Theory

“Artistic Conception”theory(“意境”理论)is an significant concept in the history of poetry art in China and abroad,the relevant discussions and applications are very extensive.The“San Jing”(“三境”说)in Wang Changling’s Shi Ge(《诗格》)was the first time to put forward the concept of“Yi Jing”(“三境”之“意境”)in Chinese literature history.Wang Changling’s theory of“San Jing”has an vital influence on the development of the later poetry theory,the creation and evaluation of the poetry.Therefore,taking Wang Changling’s“San Jing”as the research focus,on backtracking of the acceptance and interpretation about Wang Changling’s“San Jing”theory,then reinterpreting the“San Jing”based on context has crucial significance.According to the existing literature,the literature of past dynasties didn’t directly explain Wang Changling’s “San Jing”.The literature only directly recorded or applied Wang Changling’s “San Jing”,but the level of acceptance seemed to be different.During Tang and Song dynasties,the literatures that accepted Wang Changling’s theory of “San Jing” were mainly poetry,and the relevant literatures were relatively rare.Compared with Tang and Song dynasties,the Yuan and Ming dynasties added the literature about poetry appraisal,and Wang Changling’s “Yi Jing” was applied to poetry appraisal.During Qing dynasty,Wang Changling’s “San Jing” were widely used in the comment of poems and lyrics,and the number of literature was far ahead of the previous generation.Generally,as for the acceptance of Wang Changling’s “San Jing” in the past dynasties,apart from direct record of “San Jing”,other references mainly adopted the item of “Yi Jing”.However,in the references,there are some changes in the definitions of the “Yi Jing”,which emphasize the subjective and objective integration of emotions and sceneries.In addition,the interpretations of Wang Changling’s “San Jing” in academic circle are complicated and confused.Through analyzing the present specific interpretation of “San Jing”,it finds out “Apposition Theory” and “Progressive Theory” in “San Jing”.Then,it gives many different interpretations on “San Jing” from context interpretational perspective,comprehensive interpretational perspective or literary artistic perspective and Buddhism perspective.Therefore,it is necessary to interpret“San Jing”in a more objective context based on the context of Wang Changling’s“San Jing”.Through close reading of the text,to make a specific explanation of“San Jing”with the creation process,and present the clear creation process,thus defining internal definition of Wang Changling’s“San Jing”.“Wu Jing”(“物境”)means the creator takes the objective things like mountains and rivers as expressive objects,and integrates the subjective emotions with objective things to develop into the poetic conception.“Qi Jing”(“情境”)means the creator takes the objective emotions that intended to substitute in the poems as expressive objects,and integrates subjective emotions with the substitutable emotions to develop into the poetic conception.“Yi Jing”(“三境”之“意境”)means the creator takes the reasons as expressive objects,and integrates the subjective reflections with objective reasons to develop into the poetic conception.The natural characteristics of“San Jing”are the integration of subjective and objective things.And on the basis of creation practice,combines the works of Wang Changling and other poets to makes an exemplification analysis on“San Jing”.It aims to form a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of Wang Changling’s“San Jing”through the study.And in order to better distinguish the relationship between the“San Jing”and the later theory that“Artistic Conception”,that is to say,the“Yi Jing”of“San Jing”is different from the“Artistic Conception”theory,the“Wu Jing”further includes the connotation and aesthetic characteristics of the“Artistic Conception”theory.