Contrastive Analysis Of The Cognitive Semantics Between The Verb ’(?)’ And ’推’

As a bridge of communication between people,language plays a pivotal role in our daily life.L anguage in the development of human society stores the essence of civilization and assumes the role of a bridge for the development of civilization.At the same time,due to language With its powerful communicative function,it can cope with various changes in rich communication and produce a more expressive language.With the development of science and technology,there are more and more ways for people to exchange information with each other,and based on the fundamental experience of life,some words that are used very frequentlyin our lives,especially the verbs of action verbs,have more semantics than before.Different degrees of semantic expansion.The semantic content of a verb has become more and more complicated In recent years,there have been many papers analyzed from the perspective of cognitive linguistics,but most of them are limited to the comparison of semantics,and very few papers take the verbs‘(?)’and‘推’as research objects.This article analyzes and compares the cognitive semantics of the verbs‘(?)(?)’and‘推’from the perspective of cognitive linguistics with Prototype semantics,expansion meanings,semantic expansion methods,and semantic expansion path diagrams.This article takes the verbs‘(?)’and‘推’as the research objects,and takes the "meaning in the human mind" in cognitive linguistics,the dynamics of meaning,and highlighting the main role of"human" as the theoretical basis to The semantics in<(?)>,<Modem Chinese Dictionary>,<Dictionary Revision>and the examples in the CCL Modem Chinese Corpus of the Chinese Linguistics Research Center of Peking University are discussed based on the verbs‘(?)’and The prototype semantics of‘推’expands the similarities and differences between semantics,and uses the semantic expansion map to more intuitively show the difference between the expansion of the meaning of these two words.Cognitive linguistics explains the essence and source of language on the basis of "meaning is based on experience","meaning is in the mind of people",and "meaning is the combination of propositional meaning and recognition and interpretation".From a cognitive perspective,"the same objective world,China and South Korea,will produce different languages and language systems.Differences in subject cognition and communication needs different people,and different language meaning systems will inevitably produce vast differences.This article is based on the research of previous scholars,and based on the semantic items published in the Korean-Chinese dictionary,a comparative analysis of the semantic expansion of the verbs‘(?)’and‘推’.This article is divided into four parts,the main contents are as follows:The first chapter is the introduction part which mainly includes the research purpose and significance,advanced research,research objects and research methods.The second chapter is based on the semantic interpretation of‘(?)"and‘推’in the Korean-Chinese dictionary,using the principle and mechanism of semantic expansion from the perspective of cognitive linguistics to the prototype meaning of the verbs‘(?)’and‘推’and Semantic Expansion were analyzed concretely,and the image schemas of Prototype Meaning and Expansion Semantics were used to study the direction of semantic expansion of‘(?)’and‘推’more intuitively.The third chapter is based on the second chapter to discuss the semantic expansion of the verbs‘(?)’and‘推’and the relationship between the expansion of semantics.First,the semantic categories and semantic terms of‘(?)’and‘推’are discussed.After a comparative analysis,a detailed comparative analysis was carried out from the direction of semantic expansion,that is,metaphor(morphological deformation,morphological disappearance),metonymy and abstract semantic expansion.Chapter 4 is a summary and summary of the first three chapters.This article hopes to make the language learners of the two countries have a deeper understanding and understanding of these two words through the semantic comparison of the verbs‘(?)"and‘推’.