Font Size: a A A

Heidegger And The Construction Of Literary Aesthetics In The New Period

Posted on:2020-07-04Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:W X ZhangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2505305735483604Subject:Literature and art
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
As a highly creative philosopher in the history of Western philosophy,Heidegger used his own thoughts to trace back to the pre-Socratic era of ancient Greece,and revealed the end of metaphysics since Plato,guiding people to think about the forgotten "sein(being)".From the analysis outside of " Dasein”,to the "thinking" of technology,poetry and language,Heidegger reinterprets the concepts that we are used to,and tells the true direction of "sein".In the aesthetics of our country,there has been a "transformation" since the 1990s.The direction of aesthetic research shifts from asking "the essence of beauty" to "aesthesia." Some scholars are committed to breaking through the aesthetic foundation of metaphysics in the past,based on the criticism of the shortcomings of practical aesthetics,they have constructed their own aesthetic ideology.This thesis takes Heidegger’s aesthetic study of Ye Xiushan,Yu Hong,Zhang Shiying,Zhang Zhiyang and others as a "big background",with Zhu Liyuan(Practical ontology aesthetics),Yang Chunshi(Intersubjective aesthetics)and Zeng Fanren(Ecological ontology).The starting point of these three aesthetic ideas is to make up for the "dimensions" that have been lost in the past,and hope to change the way of thinking in which the aesthetics"question the essence".Zhu Liyuan reinterprets the concept of "sein",incorporates Heidegger’s fundamental ontology into "sein",and uses the concept of "practice" to give Marx the meaning of ontology;while Yang Chunshi directly interprets "existence" as "human-world existence",as a philosophical basis for aesthetics to construct the system;Zeng Fanren directly transplanted Heidegger’s tenninology,filling the meaning of the concept with the content of Chinese classical aesthetics and Marxist ideas,making it "localized".What the three people have in common is that they have a special liking for the idea that "Das ist in der Welt",and use it as a starting point for breaking the subjective thinking.In addition,they all interpret "aesthetic" as a core concept,and let aesthetics complete the change of ontology questioning.However,this acceptance of Heidegger reflects the use of the "the six classics annotating my discourse",and their final aesthetics are on the"human-self".Their aesthetic claims embodies a "human-centered" position.The aesthetic thinking turned to aesthetics did not really get rid of metaphysics,and changed "what is beauty"into "beauty in XX",just a change in expression.Heidegger,who takes "sein" as his object of life and guards against subjectivity and self-discipline,and opposes essentialism,will have a strong human nature and will fall into "essentialism".This is mainly due to the "call" and "establishment"of "people" since the new period,as well as the "humanity" and ontological questioning of aesthetics itself.Therefore,aesthetics asks the "beauty" itself,there is no problem.As a "human study," aesthetics is a study of "humanity."Without people,there is no way to talk about beauty.
Keywords/Search Tags:Anti-essentialism, Anti-anthropocentrism, Practical ontology, Ecological ontology, Intersubjective aesthetics
PDF Full Text Request
Related items