A Comparative Study Of Two Treatments For Lumbar Disc Herniation

Protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc as a common disease of the spine,the incidence of high in recent years.Patients with early lumbar disc herniation can be improved by drug therapy,but the effects of different drugs are different.Statistical learning model can help researchers of lumbar disc herniation to understand the properties of drugs,which is of significance in the field of clinical treatment.In this paper,we mainly studied two mainstream treatments for lumbar disc herniation,namely,Erioxib Tablets supplemented with Huoxue Huayu Capsules(Plan A)and Nimesulide sustained release Tablets supplemented with Huoxue Huayu Capsules(Plan B).The data were collected in accordance with the European Five-dimensional Health Questionnaire(EQ-5D).The health status,Oswestry Disability Index and Quality of Life(SF-36)were recorded before and after treatment with statistical model.The intuitive analysis showed that the daily squatting,daily social activities and self-care ability of the patients in Plan A were significantly improved,and the short and medium walking,moderate activity,walking up multiple stairs,bending and knee-bending activities were significantly optimized.Plan B patients showed significant improvement in pain degree,walking ability and standing,as well as significant improvement in bending and squatting,lifting,and walking for short and medium distances.There was no difference in walking and sex life between different regimens.In order to understand the correlation of patient characteristics at a macro level,SEM structural equation model,which is rarely used in clinical analysis,was used in this paper to explore.The results showed that the pain of plan A patients had A significant impact on social interaction and daily activities.Plan B patients’ pain perception has a greater impact on daily activities and social interaction.In the analysis of curative effect difference based on characteristic population,K-means clustering method shows a good ability of feature differentiation.Plan A has significantly improved the life self-care and sitting and waiting of young female patients aged 25-45;The degree of pain and self-care in the elderly patients aged45-60 years were significantly improved.The improvement of sitting function in elderly patients aged 60 to 70 years was significant.Plan B significantly improved the pain degree,walking and other indicators of young patients aged 20-40;The pain degree,walking and other aspects of 40-50 years old patients were improved.The degree of pain and self-care ability of elderly patients aged 50-60 years were significantly optimized.The degree of pain and self-care of elderly patients aged 60 to70 years were significantly improved.The study found one ineffective patient with little improvement in protocol B.Combined with the comprehensive improvement rate,QALYs and cost-effectiveness analysis,it was found that the comprehensive treatment effect of Plan A was better than that of Plan B,but the cost performance was lower than that of Plan B.The main effect of plan A on overall health was sitting and standing,which significantly improved the condition of middle-aged and elderly patients.The main indicators that plan B affected patients’ health were sitting function and social activities,which significantly improved the condition of young and middle-aged patients.