Research On The Problems And Countermeasures Of The Legal Responsibility Of Ecological Restoration In China

The year 2020 is the final year of China’s 13 th Five-Year Plan.It is also an important year for testing the results of China’s ecological environmental restoration work.In the coming year of 2021,as the first year of China’s 14 th Five-Year Plan and a key year of ecological civilization construction,the importance of studying the legal responsibility system for ecological restoration is self-evident.In the 13 th five year plan for ecological and environmental protection,the State Council mentioned that the innovation should be from the perspective of "protection" and "restoration",which reflects the state’s attention to the ecological environment restoration.The civil Code of the People’s Republic of China,the first law of the People’s Republic of China,also includes "environment" and "damage" as key words,reflecting the country’s determination and confidence in ecological environment governance.The legal responsibility of ecological restoration,as a post-relief method of environmental damage,can repair the damage of ecological system to a large extent while eliminating the environmental damage,so as to promote the restoration of gender health cycle of ecological system.This paper is focused on this topic,the article is divided into five chapters and the concluding remarks.The first chapter introduces the background information of the topic selection,discusses the significance of the topic selection,and summarizes the research status at home and abroad.The second chapter uses comparative research and literature research methods to summarize the legal responsibility of ecological restoration,and deepens the understanding of the topic through in-depth analysis of concepts,summary of characteristics and discussion of responsibility.The theoretical basis supporting the legal responsibility system of ecological restoration is integrated so as to describe the significance of exploring this topic.The third chapter uses the case analysis method to separate and integrate 25 legal documents in form and substance,and discusses from the two aspects of case source and specific analysis,so as to study the four dilemmas of legal responsibility for ecological restoration,which is also the innovation of this paper.The fourth chapter makes full use of the comparative research method,combs through the relevant legal systems of the United States,Germany and Australia,and summarizes the advanced experience suitable for China.The fifth chapter gives corresponding countermeasures for the institutional dilemma in the third chapter,puts forward specific solutions,and conducts targeted research and discussion.