| The current harsh ecological environment has become a major hidden danger that endangers people’s lives and property.For a long time,we have only focused on mitigating human body injuries and property losses aroused by environmental pollution and ecosystem destruction,focusing on people,but forgetting the pollution and destruction of the ecological environment itself,without paying attention Putting it on the relief of the ecological environment,the ecological environment system is devastated over time,and people cannot enjoy the service functions provided by the ecosystem.Therefore,protecting the public interest of the ecological environment is currently the focus of my country’s ecological and environmental judicial reform.my country has begun to pilot an ecological environmental damage compensation system in individual areas.It has been fully implemented,and a judicial interpretation that regulates its trial has been issued.As the ecological environment damage compensation system is carried out,how to use judicial means to improve the situation of ecological environment damage,whether the judicial organ’s trial of the facts of the case can achieve the goals pursued by the ecological damage compensation system,and how to judge the defendant to bear the most responsibility To a certain extent,it is very important to effectively repair and compensate the ecological environment and maintain the social environment and public welfare.Therefore,this article aims to analyze the results of the judgment of the defendant on the responsibility of the defendant from the perspective of the judicial practice of compensation for ecological environmental damage,select typical judgment documents as samples,sort out the existing problems,summarize useful explorations,and propose Improve the suggestions,so as to maximize the realization of the value pursuit of repairing the damaged things and maintaining the public interest.The first part is the preface,which explains the background and topic meaning of the paper,and then analyzes the research status at home and abroad around the compensation for ecological damage.The innovation of this paper is to analyze whether the judicial practice of compensation for ecological environment damage can effectively implement the purpose of repairing the damaged ecosystem pursued by ecological damage compensation system through the analysis of judicial judgment documents.The second part is an overview of liability for compensation for ecological damage and clarifies the concepts of damage and liability for damage to the ecological environment.Starting from the theory of environmental rights and the theory of ecological justice,it has laid a theoretical basis for the liability for damage to the ecological environment.The third part sorts out judicial cases of compensation for ecological environment damage,and analyzes the problems in the judgment and ruling of the ecological environment damage compensation liability,including the confusion in the identification of damage and the application of quantitative methods,the unclear determination of liability and the excessive reliance on expert opinions in the trial.The fourth part is foreign experience of the ecological damage compensation system,selecting the ecological environment damage compensation system of the United States and the European Union,focusing on the analysis of the connotation of natural resource damage,the damage identification evaluation system and the restoration system,with a view to the responsibility of my country’s ecological environment damage compensation Perfect to provide useful reference.The fifth part aims at the problems in judicial practice and draws on the experience of foreign countries,and puts forward perfect suggestions on the responsibility of ecological damage compensation. |