| Since the 1970s, higher education has increasingly been coordinated by discourses of quality control, concern about return on public investment, and student engagement. Concurrently, social movements for equality have demanded attention for issues of access and inclusion of systematically disadvantaged groups. One of the ways universities have addressed these demands is through designated services. This research investigates one such service, a women's centre, and its struggle to survive during the retrenchment of women's movement gains and rise of student engagement measures. Using institutional ethnography, I discover how extralocal texts for student engagement, primarily the National Survey of Student Engagement, shaped university priorities, were activated by local administrators, and created the conditions to amalgamate the women's centre with a centre for community-engaged learning. Administrators' actions, thus, effectively damaged the very engagement they were trying to create by prioritizing extralocal discourses over the local practices of community building, safer space, and engagement already developed within the women's centre. |
