| Distributed protocols, typically expressed as stateful agents communicating asynchronously over buffered communication channels, are difficult to design correctly. This difficulty has spurred decades of research in the area of automated model-checking algorithms. In turn, practical implementations of model-checking algorithms have enabled protocol developers to prove the correctness of such distributed protocols. However, model-checking techniques are only marginally useful during the actual development of such protocols; typically as a debugging aid once a reasonably complete version of the protocol has already been developed. The actual development process itself is often tedious and requires the designer to reason about complex interactions arising out of concurrency and asynchrony inherent to such protocols. In this dissertation we describe program synthesis techniques which can be applied as an enabling technology to ease the task of developing such protocols. Specifically, the programmer provides a natural, but incomplete description of the protocol in an intuitive representation --- such as scenarios or an incomplete protocol. This description specifies the behavior of the protocol in the common cases. The programmer also specifies a set of high-level formal requirements that a correct protocol is expected to satisfy. These requirements can include safety requirements as well as liveness requirements in the form of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formulas. We describe techniques to synthesize a correct protocol which is consistent with the common-case behavior specified by the programmer and also satisfies the high-level safety and liveness requirements set forth by the programmer. We also describe techniques for program synthesis in general, which serve to enable the solutions to distributed protocol synthesis that this dissertation explores. |
