Font Size: a A A

Comparing the performance of turned windrows and passively-aerated static piles for the Yellowknife Centralized Composting Pilot Project

Posted on:2012-06-20Degree:M.ScType:Thesis
University:Royal Roads University (Canada)Candidate:Singer, Claire LouiseFull Text:PDF
GTID:2452390008499135Subject:Environmental management
Abstract/Summary:
The City of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories (NWT), Canada, funded a centralized municipal composting pilot project based on recommendations from two studies (Gartner Lee Ltd., 2007; Ripley and Mackenzie, 2008). This study formed part of the pilot project and was designed to determine how passively-aerated static piles perform compared to turned windrows. The two systems were compared primarily through results obtained by monitoring surface and internal temperatures of two passively-aerated static piles and one control turned windrow. Feedstock materials consisted of non-shredded source-separated food waste, boxboard, mixed paper, and some yard waste. Results showed that passively-aerated static piles performed worse than turned windrows, likely as a result of poor structure, which led to compaction, and the use of non-shredded feedstock material. Performance of the control turned windrow and similarly managed windrows were also assessed and provide information for the optimization of centralized composting in the City of Yellowknife.
Keywords/Search Tags:Passively-aerated static piles, Yellowknife, Centralized, Composting, Windrows, Pilot
Related items