Study On The Optimization Of The Renewal Mode Of Rural Homestead From The Perspective Of Rural Revitalization

Rural land reform is an important breakthrough to solve the "three rural problems" in China,the homestead reform involves a huge group of farmers,is an important part of rural revitalization.The article selects Cixi City in the northern plain of Zhejiang,Yiwu City in the hilly basin of central Zhejiang,and Yunhe County in the southwestern mountainous area of Zhejiang Province to conduct research,and divides the villages involved in the survey into four types: urban village,suburb,outer suburb and remote.The willingness of the farmers in each village was summarized and analyzed,and the wishes and differences of the four types of farmers in the three counties were summarized and analyzed.The farmer’s welfare index system is constructed from the three aspects of farmers’ economic status,living conditions and psychological status.The fuzzy evaluation method is used to measure and evaluate the changes of farmer’s welfare.The Theil index is used to measure the welfare difference,and the regional differences of farmer welfare are analyzed.At last,the paper combines the analysis results of farmers’ willingness and welfare,and the factors of local location,resource endowment and government driving force to choose the appropriate renewal mode.Through the research,this paper finds that:(1)Farmers’ willingness varies from place to place.Yiwu farmers have the highest willingness to withdraw,followed by Yunhe County,Cixi City is the lowest,and farmers’ willingness has little to do with village types,but has a greater correlation with local conditions.The reasons why farmers are reluctant to withdraw from the homestead are concentrated on not understanding,dissatisfied policies or being satisfied with their current living conditions.The reason for willingness to withdraw is that farmers hope to improve their living standards through exit.(2)There are differences in the welfare levels of farmers in different places.The welfare level of farmers in Yiwu is the highest,Cixi is the second,and Yunhe County is the lowest.The level of welfare of farmers in different types of areas is different,showing a state of diminishing welfare levels from urban villages to remote areas,but the diminishing situation in the three places is different.The Taier index also reflects that among the three counties and cities,Yunhe County has the greatest difference in the welfare level of farmers,followed by Yiwu City,while Cixi City has a significantly smaller difference.(3)Due to differences in various aspects of village development,regional economic level and farmers’ willingness,the renewal patterns vary from place to place.In more developed areas,the homestead renewal model is dominated by urban transformation and retention intensive types,while the economic development is relatively backward.The renewal model is more diverse,and it is more necessary to consider the differences between different types of villages.Generally speaking,from the village in the city to the remote areas,the transformation type of cities and towns,the conservation type,the integration type of the village in the city and the reconstruction type in different places are gradually implemented,but the actual development situation of villages and the wishes of farmers should also be considered.(4)In the process of homestead reform,the government needs to increase the propaganda of relevant policies,speed up the registration of homesteads,aim to improve the welfare level of farmers,establish and improve the homestead renewal mechanism,and respect the wishes of farmers.Farmers need to participate in government and collective activities,communicate with the government,and express their wishes.The village collective should cooperate with and participate in the relevant work of the government and protect the interests of farmers.This research area does not cover all the geographical and economic types of Zhejiang Province.The welfare index system of farmers and the development index of villages are not fully suitable for all areas.In the future,the research can expand the area,establish a more universal index system,increase more objective indicators or research directions as factors to be considered..