Guan Jiangang's "point To Writing" Reading Teaching Research

In 2013,guan jiangang put forward the reading teaching concept of "writing-oriented",which had a certain impact on the traditional Chinese reading teaching concept in primary schools."writing-oriented" does not emphasize the form of "writing",but to cultivate the awareness of "writing",and to provide students with "writing skills" in reading teaching."Writing-oriented" reading advocates "integrated teaching of reading and writing",and pays attention to the connection and interaction between reading teaching and writing teaching,which improves the efficiency of Chinese reading class to a certain extent.Through data collection,the author finds that there are few research materials on the reading teaching of "directed writing",and no systematic comments have been made on it.This study takes guan jiangang’s "writing-oriented" reading teaching concept and practice as the research object,and through the comments on its connotation,proposition,theoretical basis,implementation process,method,characteristics and other aspects,discusses the experience and inspiration of "writing-oriented" reading teaching and the problems to be paid attention to in the learning process.After sorting out,the author finds that the "writing-oriented" reading teaching pays special attention to the "text form",emphasizes the "pragmatic" function,and attaches importance to the cultivation of "writing ability",which is the adherence to the idea of "promoting writing by reading".In terms of teaching emphasis,the "writing-oriented" reading class advocates a shift from "words and sentences" to "paragraphs and articles".In terms of learning style,the author advocates to change from "reading aloud" to "reading silently".In terms of teaching content,it is advocated to change from "teaching by writing" to "teaching by learning".Guan Jian Gang "to write" reading teaching embodies the teaching concept of the "integration of reading and writing",and the new pan and professor of "standard" in the field of language education and international mother tongue education concept of "reading and writing accomplishment",respectively from the Angle of the scholars,academic point of view for "to write" provides a theoretical basis.In practice,the author sorts out the main teaching links of "writing-oriented" reading course--"preview and understanding","reading and understanding","expression and sharing",and lists several commonteaching methods--"contrast","analogy","reduction","trial and error" and "identification".Lesson in combination with the specific example,the author summarizes the reading classes "to write" the three major characteristics: one,starting from the overall understanding of the text content,a quick victory;Second,weaken the text "education" function,so far;Three,based on the feelings of expression form,to the point.Based on class examples and my own teaching experience,the author focuses on the enlightenment of "writing-oriented" reading teaching to front-line Chinese teachers at present,such as "The combination of reading and writing should have a clear direction and clear place" "turn the content into the form,and even simple texts are worth teaching" "attach importance to improving students’ thinking quality in the process of reading".Although "writing-oriented" the reading orientation has its positive significance,but the first-line teachers not deified concept,"pointing to the writing" is not the only orientation of reading teaching,neither will the classroom in the process of reference into a pile of writing knowledge and preach,not Gu Xue feeling,confusion of learning in each of the target,more can’t replace writing teaching.Through this study,on the one hand,can make the reader understand the reading teaching "to write" the basic idea and the concrete implementation process and results,on the other hand can also be implemented process of really is beneficial to improve the efficiency of reading classroom strategies and migration path to the current Chinese reading class,and to avoid some misunderstanding.