A Comparative Analysis Of The Top Four Badminton Men's Doubles In The 31st Rio Olympic Games

Based on the research of relevant scholars,this paper studies the technique in the video of 4 games between the men's doubles and top four athletes of badminton(Zhangnan/Fuhaifeng,Hongwei/Chaibiao,Chenweiqiang/Wuweisheng,Marcus Ellis/Chris Langridge)in the 31st Rio Games.Using the method of documentation,the published research results in related fields are combed and studied.Using expert interviews to repeatedly discuss and determine research indicators;Design forms and record selected videos using video observation;At last,the comparison and application of the four pairs of male pairs technology are studied by mathematical statistics method,and the law of this method is explored by general and special logical reasoning method.Multidimensionality compares the advantages and disadvantages of each team in the competition,gets the application of the four technologies of the Olympic games,summarizes the future development trend,through the multi-angle,all-around contrast analysis,summarizes the actual application of the laws of technology,constantly enrich our competitive analysis theory,for our country in the Olympic badminton double event scientific geography theory.At the same time,it provides a theoretical reference for the coaches in the actual training and the technical arrangement of the competition.The following conclusions were drawn from the analysis:1.At the 31st Rio Games,the proportion of the scoring paragraphs in the men's doubles quartet began to decrease gradually.The successive paragraphs,the highest score round from the start of the serve to the end of the sixth round,with 48.89%,are key to the point of failure,and therefore the focus of technical statistics and analysis should be on the chain of transmission to the various country combinations.2.Regions 1 and 5 were the two regions that most of the men's doubles players chose to serve at the 31st Rio Games.The percentage of serve points in zone 1 was 66.34%and the percentage of serve points in zone 5 was 18.92%.The reception points are concentrated in the front court,the midfield area,and the total share of these two areas reached 97.13%,regions 4 and 5 are in second and third place in the midfield,with 17.49 per cent and 16.45 per cent,while Sector 1,in the backhand position,is in fourth place,with 16.19 per cent.3.The rubbing technique and the pushing technique are the two techniques that most serve.The proportion of rubbing technique is 46.34%and the proportion of pushing technique is 42.67%,in the game,each team has paid more attention to the competition in the front court,all try to take the lead in the serve,strive for initiative.4.The third shot had the highest active effect ratio 51.69%,the passive effect ratio 33.89%,the loss ratio 9.87%and the direct score ratio 2.25%.The result of the third stroke after serving,it is more difficult to win the score directly.It is also difficult to extend the advantage of serving.5.When the third beat gets active,the fifth beat gets more of an active and direct score,but the opponent may throw it back through the defensive counterattack to get passive and lose points;when the third clap effect is passive,the fifth clap is more passive and lose score,and occupy a large proportion,but still have the opportunity to reverse the passive through the active defense,get active,show that the third clap effect has a direct impact on the fifth clap effect,and the impact is very large.6.The active effect of the fourth beat accounted for 74.27%,while the passive effect of the fourth beat accounted for 10.28%.The fourth beat compared with the third beat,from the overall effect and the offensive has been significantly improved,indicating that the men's double four badminton players in the 31st Rio Olympic Games in the fourth beat the advantage of the third beat,the serve on the court obviously more advantageous.7.When the fourth beat gets the initiative,not only the error rate gets the effective control,the sixth beat can still keep the advantage down even into a direct score;When the fourth stroke is normal and passive,it does not result in a point loss or a direct score due to the opponent's error.On the contrary,the ratio of re winning the initiative was significantly higher than that of the fifth shot,indicating that the receiving side had a higher chance of scoring directly and actively than the first three shots.8.Among the utilization rate of the whole field,the highest use rate of the prior field was 12.6%,followed by 10.1%;the use rate of blocking technique was the highest in midfield,with 17.4%,followed by putt with 15.6%.The backfield technology is the most used,10.2%.9.1n terms of the gain and loss of the whole field,the highest percentage of the ball throwing technique was 30.3%in the front field.The highest score rate was 14.2%for ball poling and hook;in the midfield area,the score rate of net sealing was the first,13.2%.The score rate of blocking and picking was the highest,11.9%and 10.7%respectively;in the back field,the highest score rate was 3.9%and the highest score rate was 16.7%.