An Analysis Of Anthropocentrism In The Perspective Of Environmental Philosophy

"The world will not satisfy man,who is determined to change it by his own action.(from Lenin)the world in which we live and develop today is a "world belonging to man" constructed by the practical power of man.There is no one,there is no such world;In the personal world,man is the center.In this sense,anthropocentrism has been established and,naturally,continues to this day.But with the development of modern industrialization start caused by environmental pollution and ecological destruction problems worse,and environmental philosophy rise to the constant impact of the traditional anthropocentrism and all sorts of questions,to have faith and conclusion more and more not confident,and start as anthropocentrism is the theory of modern environmental disaster sinners,academic requirements out of,beyond even completely abandon the calls of the anthropocentrism.If the fact-based anthropocentrism in the sense of naturalism has been refuted by science,will the axiological anthropocentrism be overturned accordingly? If it is not overturned,how can it continue to exist and speak? This is the big question that this paper focuses on and tries to answer.This paper argues that although various "non-anthropocentrism" ideas in environmental philosophy have raised doubts on anthropocentrism,they are not enough to fundamentally shake the fundamental position of anthropocentrism in the creation of human civilization.The analysis of anthropocentrism from the perspective of environmental philosophy should focus on four points.First,the real causes of environmental problems should be theoretically summarized.Second,we must make the necessary theoretical explanation to the humanity and value of the world we live in.Third,we should follow the historical thinking dimension,starting from the existing state of human reality,and explain the historical development and current state of anthropocentrism.Fourthly,this paper expounds the reasonable anthropocentrism in the dimensions of axiology,ontology and practice.For this reason,the first chapter of this paper reviews the historical development and current state of anthropocentrism from the perspective of "diachronic state",discusses the basic meaning of anthropocentrism and the complex relationship between anthropocentrism and environmental philosophy.The second chapter takes the theoretical "syntenses" as the axis,deeply discusses the main schools of environmental philosophy to the anthropocentrism proposed by the cross-examination,made the revision,not only positively absorbs its main ideological achievements,but also analyzes and points out the contradiction of the theoretical premise of environmental philosophy.Chapter 3 as the focus of the full text,aimed at environmental philosophy of anthropocentrism series question and dump on positive reflection and the overall response,from the philosophy of the three dimensions that three kinds of sense to ask and answer the anthropocentrism of ultimate question: one is in fact or value on the theory of value dimensions of clear anthropocentrism is not a scientific theory in the sense of fact judgement,but value theory in the sense of value judgment;Man is not the center of the universe,but man is always the center of value and evaluation.Second,from the ontological dimension of truth or falsehood,it is clear that anthropocentrism has not become a real reality,but mostly degenerated into various forms of individual centrism,so it has almost become a typical false proposition in the sense of epistemology-truth theory.Three is the practical dimensions beyond or refactoring,clear anthropocentrism no matter theoretical expressed as a value proposition,or as a practical reason,expressed by the practical requirement is not better than,is unable to avoid,can’t change,but it should be fully absorbed the contemporary environmental philosophy on the basis of the positive results of historic to construct,make it become a relative and conditional,reasonable configuration of anthropocentrism,thus laying a new foundation of the whole human civilization building is the most important and continue to continue to develop new to the standard.