Research On The Jurisdiction Of International Sports Arbitration Court

Since its inception,the International Sports Arbitration Court has been regarded as the “Supreme Court” in the field of sports.It has jurisdiction over sports-related disputes.With the development of sports commercialization and professionalism,sports disputes are increasing and the fairness of sports solutions is required.Higher and higher.Based on the "compulsory jurisdiction" of the International Sports Arbitration Court,there have been many disputes about the neutrality and fairness of arbitration,and it has triggered the intervention of external justice.In view of this,this paper uses the literature data method,comparative analysis method,logic analysis method and case analysis method to systematically analyze the jurisdiction of the International Sports Arbitration Court,summarize the disputes with the case,and put forward opinions and suggestions on fair and impartial jurisdiction.The research results mainly include the following aspects:First,it clarifies the scope and basis of the jurisdiction of the International Sports Arbitration Court.According to the Arbitration Rules,the International Sports Arbitration Court has divided jurisdictions for ordinary arbitration procedures,appeal arbitration procedures,and special Olympic arbitration procedures,and obtained compulsory jurisdiction through the regulations of the major sports organizations and the athletes' agreement.Secondly,through analysis,it is pointed out that the compulsory jurisdiction of sports arbitration has its reasonable and legal basis.The essence of the jurisdiction of the International Sports Arbitration Court is not mandatory,but the independence and impartiality of the ruling of the International Sports Arbitration Court.Thirdly,systematically analyzed the typical cases of Gandel and Peschstein.The above two cases promoted the reform of the International Sports Arbitration Court.The Arbitration Institute has adjusted the arbitration institutions,arbitrators,and arbitration procedures.However,independence and impartiality still need to be improved.Fourth,in response to the above problems,the International Sports Arbitration Court should improve its jurisdiction,organizational structure,and personnel composition to enhance its legality.Coordinate the power distribution relationship between sports organizations,establish effective communication channels with external justice,and maintain the autonomy jurisdiction of the International Sports Arbitration Institute within the sports industry.Correspondingly,in the process of moving towards a sports power,China is constantly strengthening its research work on the International Sports Arbitration Court,improving the relevant laws and regulations of the Chinese sports arbitration system,establishing a sports arbitration system,and better promoting the resolution of sports disputes.