Research On The Negotiation Mechanism In Community Governance

Since the mid-1990 s,with the deepening of marketization and housing reforms,many new organizations have continuously emerged in urban communities.These organizations participate in the management of public affairs in the community and form with other organizations and individuals in the community.The complicated social relations have had a wide impact on community governance.In particular,property companies,neighborhood committees,business committees,and residents in the community,as different stakeholders,have different demands.Conflicts often occur in the process of balancing interests.As one of the important mechanisms for solving problems in urban communities,the negotiation governance mechanism can enable different organizations and individuals in the community to effectively express and maintain their own interests through legalized participation and voice platforms,enhance understanding and resolve disputes,making grassroots issues Get an effective solution.But as a new thing,the negotiation governance mechanism is still in the ascending stage,and there are many problems in the process of urban community governance.It can be said that the research on the mechanism of consultation and governance of urban communities is conducive to deepening the research of urban community governance.It can improve the effectiveness of community governance from practice and promote the process of grassroots democratization.Regarding the research on the negotiation governance mechanism,most of the previous scholars have discussed the lack of institutional structure at the macro and meso level and the significance of constructing democratic consultation in the community.The occurrence and operation of the negotiation mechanism in urban community governance There are few logic researches,and few scholars use the perspective of the new problems in community governance,connect the effectiveness and dilemma of the process of community negotiation governance with stakeholders and multi-center governance theory,and peek into the current implementation of the normalization of urban community negotiation governance.In the response plan.Because community consultation governance cannot be discussed without the “stranger society” field in the community of “acquaintances”,it is also inseparable from the negotiation situation and process of the specific problems in community governance,to explore the encounters in community governance.The specific problems that have been exemplified reflect the wisdom of consultation and governance of urban communities in China and are also an important manifestation of the modernization of community governance.First,clarify the concepts and theories related to the urban community interest negotiation mechanism.Including the definition of community governance,interest negotiation mechanism,pet dog wounding disputes,combing stakeholders theory,multi-center governance theory.Second,it analyzes and summarizes the power source and logic of the current interest negotiation mechanism in urban community governance.First of all,based on the analysis of existing theories,it is believed that the common community governance needs under the three logics of the state,society and citizens have promoted the implementation of community consultation governance by the grassroots government.Secondly,it analyzes and improves the operation logic of changing from common governance needs to promoting community negotiation governance: effective implementation of system supply,good coordination of participating subjects and reasonable use of situational discourse.Third,taking the case of pet dog injury disputes in the L community in Shanghai as an example,through participatory observation and in-depth interviews,it was found that conflicts related to pet dog injury problems in the governance process of the L community were found in the community.Negotiation is the main,which involves consultation and communication among various stakeholders in the community,which is in line with the operation of the interest negotiation mechanism in the process of urban community governance.Based on the theory of multi-center governance and stakeholder theory,the analysis of the direction of negotiation governance in the L community is the two-dimensional integration of negotiation form and situational discourse.The effect of community L in the implementation of community consultation governance is: establishing a normalized community consultation governance mechanism,improving the efficiency of community governance and the satisfaction of community residents,and strengthening the sense of identity in community governance.Fourth,based on a case-by-case analysis,from the small to the big,summed up from point to point,in the process of urban community consultation and governance,there are still insufficient supply of the system,insufficient participation of social forces,situational discourse system Problems such as inadequate use of the system and weak public awareness of residents 'participation in community governance.Finally,it provides a matching plan for improving the performance of the urban community's interest negotiation.First,it is necessary to consolidate the system supply,including strengthening the legal guarantee and improving the community negotiation mechanism.The second is to give play to social forces and improve governance efficiency.The third is to rationally choose the discourse system and strengthen the use of rational tools.The fourth is to cultivate residents' sense of responsibility and protect the community's public interests.Theoretically speaking,the research on the mechanism of urban community negotiation governance is conducive to deepening the research of urban community governance,the research of grassroots negotiation,and the research of multi-center governance theory.In practice,it is conducive to improving the effectiveness of community governance.In the past,most of the scholars' studies were discussed from the macro and meso level regarding the lack of institutional structure and the significance of constructing democratic consultation in the community.There is little or no research on the occurrence and operation logic of the negotiation mechanism in urban community governance.Scholars use the perspective of the new problems in community governance,connect the effectiveness and dilemma of community negotiation governance with stakeholders and multi-center governance theory,and peek into the current response to the implementation of the normal operation of urban community negotiation governance.Community consultation governance cannot be separated from discussions in the "strangers society" field of the "acquaintance society" of the community,nor can it be inseparable from the negotiation situation and process of specific problems existing in community governance,to explore the problems encountered in community governance The particular problems encountered reflect the wisdom of consultation and governance of urban communities in China,and are also an important manifestation of the modernization of community governance.This article combines the pet dog wounding disputes in the L community of Shanghai's S district as an example.From the occurrence of the incident-the process of negotiation governance,this micro perspective is used to interpret the basic operation and effectiveness of multiagent interest negotiation.What is it? What is the optimized path? Through the discussion of this issue,it will deepen the community stakeholders' awareness and consensus on community negotiation governance,and contribute to the normal operation of the urban community interest negotiation mechanism.At the same time,it is hoped that the content of this study can be used for urban community pet management Contribute to pet services,the harmony of the relationship between people and pets,and the harmony of the neighborhood in the community.The specific research contents of this article are as follows:First,clarify the concepts and theories related to the urban community interest negotiation mechanism.Including the definition of community governance,interest negotiation mechanism,pet dog wounding disputes,combing stakeholders theory,multi-center governance theory.Second,it analyzes and summarizes the power source and logic of the current interest negotiation mechanism in urban community governance.First of all,based on the analysis of existing theories,it is believed that the common community governance needs under the three logics of the state,society and citizens have promoted the implementation of community consultation governance by the grassroots government.Secondly,it analyzes and improves the operation logic of changing from common governance needs to promoting community negotiation governance: effective implementation of system supply,good coordination of participating subjects and reasonable use of situational discourse.Third,taking the case of pet dog injury disputes in the L community in Shanghai as an example,through participatory observation and in-depth interviews,it was found that conflicts related to pet dog injury problems in the governance process of the L community were found in the community.Negotiation is the main,which involves consultation and communication among various stakeholders in the community,which is in line with the operation of the interest negotiation mechanism in the process of urban community governance.Based on the theory of multi-center governance and stakeholder theory,the analysis of the direction of negotiation governance in the L community is the two-dimensional integration of negotiation form and situational discourse.The effect of community L in the implementation of community consultation governance is: establishing a normalized community consultation governance mechanism,improving the efficiency of community governance and the satisfaction of community residents,and strengthening the sense of identity in community governance.Fourth,based on a case-by-case analysis,from the small to the big,summed up from point to point,in the process of urban community consultation and governance,there are still insufficient supply of the system,insufficient participation of social forces,situational discourse system Problems such as inadequate use of the system and weak public awareness of residents 'participation in community governance.Finally,it provides a matching plan for improving the performance of the urban community's interest negotiation.First,it is necessary to consolidate the system supply,including strengthening the legal guarantee and improving the community negotiation mechanism.The second is to give play to social forces and improve governance efficiency.The third is to rationally choose the discourse system and strengthen the use of rational tools.The fourth is to cultivate residents' sense of responsibility and protect the community's public interests.