Research On Quantitative Rule Of Ephedrine-Containing Precursor Related Crime

With the strict control of the drug crimes and the strict punishment of the state,criminals are making huge profits,constantly refining the drug-making materials by iteratively updating the raw material ingredients and changing the production process,providing a drug-making source for the drug market,and making drugs.Item crime has also become another high-profile crime in the drug governance criminal circle.Ephedrine is the main raw material for the manufacture of amphetamine-type drugs.The quantity of ephedrine-based poisoning articles is an important factor affecting the factors of crime.It is a key indicator affecting the conviction and sentencing.The problem of determining the number of crimes containing ephedrine-based toxic substances has Important practical significance.Starting from the judicial case of criminal cases involving ephedrine-based toxic articles in China,the biggest problem in practice is blindly refer to the quantitative identification rules for the application of drug-related crimes without purity,and the influence of severe punishment on the special preventive utility of criminal law,quantitative rules The confusion applies to the sentence sentencing imbalance.The reason is that the identification of the content of the toxic substances has not yet been fully popularized,and the application of the "Calculated in Purity" rules has been hindered.In view of the current application of the rules for the identification of the quantity of ephedrine and other toxic substances in China,this paper starts with a large number of controversial judgments in practice,and critically reflects on the application of the quantitative theory of quantitative law in the crime of making drug products.Pros and cons,from this,explore the necessity,feasibility and specific application path of the "purity theory" quantitative rules,and propose that the "purity theory" of the general purity of the drug production quantity identification rules should be constructed,and finally the controversial judgment case Apply the "purity theory" quantitative rules to correct,in order to achieve the purpose of adapting crimes and punishments,and safeguard the authority of judicial justice.