Research On The Optimization Of The Judicial Participation Of The People’s Assessors In The Grass-roots Courts Of Shenzhen

In recent years,In recent years,the People’s assessors of Shenzhen basic-level courts have actively,effectively and orderly participated in the judicial trial,to a certain extent,playing their value function of promoting judicial public trust,establishing judicial authority and realizing judicial justice,but in the judicial practice for many years,it is also revealed that the people’s assessors "choose but not let go","let but not accompany","jury but not try" and so on all sorts of problems which affect the public participation in the judicial effect,deviate from the original intention of the system design and so on need to be solved.The People’s jury law of the People’s Republic of China,enacted and put into effect in 2018,has introduced some targeted reforms to the judicial participation of people’s jurors,and some of the drawbacks have been legally guaranteed and substantively resolved,however,according to the practice of the People’s assessor law of the People’s Republic of China for more than one year,some deep-rooted problems of public judicial participation still have not been solved.In view of how to optimize the judicial participation of the jurors in the grass-roots courts of Shenzhen City,this paper takes the theory of public participation as the basic theoretical framework through the methods of literature analysis,questionnaire survey,interview,induction and summary,etc.,from the three important dimensions of the subject,content and environment of the public judicial participation,this paper sums up and analyzes the current situation and problems of the judicial participation of the people’s jurors in the grass-roots courts of Shenzhen City.At the same time,in the light of the actual situation of the country,the city and the court,actively study and learn from the mature jury experience offoreign countries,constantly enhance the universality and independence of the participants,and strengthen the public awareness of the rule of law and the idea of upholding the law through the popularization of the law,we will improve the mechanism to guarantee participation,stimulate public motivation for participation,ensure citizens’ substantive participation in trials,achieve win-win outcomes for all,further demonstrate the efficiency of the people’s assessors’ judicial participation,realize judicial democracy,and demonstrate judicial credibility.