Research On The New Rural Community Governance From The Perspective Of The Party’s Theory Of Grassroots Mass Autonomy

Since its establishment,the Communist Party of China has been actively exploring and practicing grass-roots mass self-government,constantly innovating democratic governance methods,and improving the system of villagers’ self-government.With the development of urbanization,the new rural community has become an important carrier of the integrated development of urban and rural areas,we find that the new rural community governance faces multiple problems.This paper attempts to start from the party’s theory of grassroots mass autonomy,summarizes the current situation and characteristics of the new rural community governance,reveals the plight of the new rural community governance,analyzes the causes and mechanisms,and finally puts forward relevant countermeasures and suggestions.The paper is divided into five parts.In the first part,the research status of new rural community governance at home and abroad is described.The second part introduces the related concepts and theoretical basis of the new rural community governance.The third part expounds the background and characteristics of the new rural community governance.The fourth part discusses the problems and causes of the new rural community governance.The fifth part puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions to improve the new rural community governance.By analyzing the characteristics of the new rural community governance,it is found that the new rural community has multiple characteristics,such as the diversification of governance subjects,the modernization of governance means,the grid of governance organizations and the integration of governance methods.In addition,it is found that there are some limitations in the new rural community governance,such as prominent separation of people and land,fragmented governance,confusion of governance organization roles,administrative governance,weak sense of belonging,difficult to move local habits,and analysis of the reasons behind it.In view of the above problems,it is proposed to deepen the reform of the land system and give full play to the right to the use of agricultural land;eliminate the status quo of fragmented governance and provide integrated and personalized services;clarify the responsibilities of governance organizations and realize the identity of managers;focus on the grassroots masses and promote community services through “three social linkages”;realize the integration of urban and rural community subjects andimprove the ability of residents to participate;strengthen cultural transformation,remoulding community residents’ consciousness and so on.