Study On The Reform And Improvement Of The People’s Jury System

The people’s jury system is an important part of the judicial system with Chinese characteristics.It gives full play to the democratic nature of the people and promotes judicial openness,safeguards judicial fairness and enhances judicial credibility by involving people’s jurors in trials.The people’s jury system is a fine tradition of the people’s judicature,an important form for the people to be masters of the country and participate in the management of state affairs in accordance with the law.People’s juror system since the 1950 s institutionalization,experienced a long and tortuous process of development,from August 2004,and "decision about improve the system of people’s assessors" in April 2015,the people’s juror system reform pilot program ",making people’s jury system in our country had great progress,but in the process of people’s jurors system implementation and pilot,the flaws of the system itself and its pilot exposed serious problems in the process of the development of the system of the people’s juror system.W C H province city district law authorized departments of the National People’s Congress standing committee of the supreme people’s court trial court determine people’s juror system reform,the author through to the W C H province city district court people’s juror system reform present situation investigation,discovered in the process of people’s jurors in the jury is still accompany without trial,or without discussion and applicable case is arbitrary and people’s assessors taking part in people’s assessors and imbalance of the number of cases significantly,in court jury,elected by the people’s assessors limitations,difficult to substantive participation,the advantage of the people’s jury system has failed to fully release,It is necessary to perfect the people’s juror system by forming a scientific evaluation system for the people’s juror,improving the judge’s instruction system,protecting the right of the people’s juror to express their opinions in the trial activities,and establishing the list system of facts and legal trials.