Forged Electronic Tickets To Acquire The Properties Of Propert Y Interest

Theft is "the act of stealing from other people's property",and the fraud acts as "the act of cheating others to deliver the property," and the victim was reported to have suffered a real loss in the property.It's usually pretty clear whether you're being "cheated" or "stolen.".However,with all manner of crime,the typical element pattern may be broken,and there are many thefts,fraud,criminal cases.It has become increasingly difficult to make distinction and fraud more difficult,with a clear distinction between the legal practice of theft and deception in the legal practice and the guiding principle of the criminal case.And as the market economy continues to develop,the ticket form faces some new situations,such as the emergence of a ticket of electronic prices,which makes it difficult to identify the offender.The theory has not yet been studied and outlined in the theory world.As a result,I intend to conduct some preliminary discussions on the case of theft,fraud,forgery and ticket,through study of the case,the distinction between theft,fraud,counterfeiting,counterfeiting,and ticket In the hopes of some reference and use of a theory of judicial practice.This article is divided into four parts,about 20,000 words.The first part is the introduction of the case.In this article,the case primarily depicts the behavior of the suspect,a man who illegally copied large amounts of money for a meal card,tricked out the restaurant's service.The question of the nature of the suspect criminal behavior creates the following contention: the nature of li's actions to be removed from his debt by deception,the properties of the electronic ticket.The second part analysed the argument from a theoretical point of view.This section examines the subject of the dispute in relation to fraud and forgery of ticket crime,and analyses of the differences between fraud and theft offences.The analyses of the case is consist in the third part.This article is based on forensic analysis and analyses the case and concluded.It's not theft,it's argued,that Li constitutes a criminal fraud.In part 4 of the study.According to what I have studied,The combination of the present judicial practice with "explicit ` ticket' meaning","widening the scope of`fabricated' and "clearly ` clear ` on the victim's property","clearly `clear` the victim's property scope","explicit `public-private property' "advice to solve the problem of judicial practice.