Research On Linear Cultural Heritage Protection Evaluation System

Linear cultural heritage is a kind of heritage type derived from cultural lines.It mainly refers to the material and intangible cultural heritage communities in linear or strip regions with special cultural resources,focusing on linear areas.With the increasing attention to linear culture from all walks of life,the protection and development of linear culture have made some achievements,but under the background of rapid urbanization,Due to the insufficient understanding of linear cultural heritage and improper protection measures,a considerable part of the linear cultural heritage living environment is threatened,and the complete site or historical information of linear cultural heritage is missing.The individual and the cross-regional whole Be destroyed or even disappear.At the same time,in recent years,scholars' research on linear cultural heritage tends to value type,tourism development and so on,and its protection research,especially protection evaluation research,is less.Therefore,based on the perspective of linear cultural heritage protection as a whole,there are few studies on the protection and evaluation of linear cultural heritage.The evaluation and research on its protection status will have reference and reference significance for formulating the protection countermeasures and bringing more linear cultural heritage into the protection scope.On the basis of the systematic research on the concept,contents and methods of linear cultural heritage,this paper is based on the analysis of the linear cultural heritage.The evaluation system of linear cultural heritage protection is constructed in two aspects: the condition of heritage resources and the degree of cultural dissemination along the route,and the weight of each index factor is determined.The comprehensive analysis is carried out by taking the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal and Jingcheng Ancient Road as examples.The main research contents are as follows:The first part mainly discusses the research background and significance of the evaluation of linear cultural heritage protection,summarizes the research on linear cultural heritage at home and abroad,and explains the related concepts and theoretical methods on this basis.It provides theoretical support for the research of this paper.The second part is to study and construct two secondary comprehensive levels including the condition of heritage resources along the route,the degree of cultural transmission alongthe route,the material cultural heritage,the natural heritage landscape and the intangible cultural heritage.Dissemination shows the evaluation system of 4 three-level items,10four-level factors and 20 five-level evaluation factors.The weights of related factors are determined by analytic hierarchy process(AHP).The third part: taking the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei section of the Grand Canal and the ancient imperial road in Beijing as an example,through the analysis of the evaluation,we find the shortcomings in the protection of the linear cultural heritage,and on this basis,put forward some protection strategies and suggestions.It provides reference for the protection and utilization of linear cultural heritage.Finally,the research results of the paper are summarized and prospected.The results show that the preservation and abundance of the heritage along the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal are better than those along the ancient imperial road in Beijing,especially in the aspects of material cultural heritage,intangible cultural heritage and dissemination and display;But the natural heritage landscape protection of the ancient imperial road in Beijing is relatively good.Specifically,in terms of material and cultural heritage,the Grand Canal is relatively good in terms of the integrity of valuable urban buildings,the unique value of cultural relics and monuments,and the scale of valuable buildings.The ancient imperial road is relatively good in preserving the integrity of valuable rural buildings,and both of them are generally inadequate in the preservation of agricultural and cultural heritage.In terms of natural heritage landscape,The ancient imperial road is relatively good in the nature of the natural geological heritage,the preservation of the ecological environment of the wetland,the diversity of animal and plant resources,the preservation of the environment of the ecological vegetation,and the preservation of the plant and plant area,and the Grand Canal is better in the resource abundance of the scenic spots.In the aspect of intangible cultural heritage,the Grand Canal is relatively good in the long history of cultural heritage,the influence of historical events and the diversity of folk culture.In terms of the degree of cultural communication along the line,the Grand Canal is relatively good in the aspects of the spread of culture,the depth of culture,the degree of public display and the degree of academic attention.The depth of the ancient imperial road in the study of culture and the degree of academic attention are obvious deficiencies.