Truth And Time—Focusing On Heidegger’s Texts In The Period Of Being And Time

According to a common-sense,truth and the time should be two unrelated,even repel each other.Time usually means,change,and the truth means no change,doesn’t change over time.But in heidegger’s view,the above view,the fact that the truth is set to be "out of time",is actually based on the conclusion of a time view of the time,which is a time view of the movement characteristics of the original time,and the time is merely regarded as the continuation of numerous points.According to this view,the truth and the time is irrelevant.However,according to heidegger’s point of view,truth and time are not only two distinct and separate things,but there is also a fundamental relationship between them.From heidegger’s thought of their own path,the aim of "being and time" is in the time horizon of questions exist,there will be the meaning of traceability is conceits of timeliness,,and after that,heidegger seems to about this in timeliness,and Ereignis as the ultimate essence of their thought,this clearly suggests that he has his own of truth based on time before the thought route of give up.On the other hand,the success or failure of heidegger’s thought of truth based on the time dependent on the effectiveness of a transcendental argument.Which means,if you admit heidegger’s transcendental argument,you will surely acknowledge the kind of relationship that heidegger has established.But as long as the transcendental argument of how the truth acquires the stipulation in time is not clearly stated,the possibility and validity of the truth which is based on the existence of understanding is still a question of suspense.According to the logical relationship in full paper mainly divided into the following four aspects:The first chapter:the first is the traditional conforms to the content of the theory of truth and the introduction of the dilemmas facing.The second is that heidegger’s question of the traditional sense of truth,and the traditional concept of truth is the real sense of the concept,which is the true sense of the claim,but it’s essentially the relationship between the dominant and the dominant and the relationship between "A"and "B",and how the two different things fit together,one is the one that knows what it is.And heidegger’s truth is more true than that,he believes that the assertion must first have an object,and there are two ways in which an object can be ecstasis:revealing and displaying.What he means is that A wants to be in line with B and it has to give itself first,it is given A before we can say who is in line with it.The.second chapter:So it as reveal A.Revelation is the revelation of the existence at the level of existence,the truth is revealed as the existence,and the truth as the manifestation is on the ontological level,to discover that an existing person must first exist,only to find out that it exists to know what it is,what it is,how it is,and how it exists,so it is shown to reveal the foundation.Worry and then put the two together,all of this in the behavior it is worry about a way,all kinds of found that only one of them,but worry about itself is based on time.The three Chapter:however,the construction of the structure is based on the time,and the temporality makes it possible to worry about the structure.Conceits make possible a planning,beyond,comprehend,realm has made it possible to where to go,he may,is that we understand "handiness" and "unavailability" possible conditions,so we came out of it to grasp.The revelation of truth is based on time,so it can be concluded that truth is also based on time.So far we have come to the conclusion that time is the foundation of truth.The four Chapter:but whether or not the time truly is the foundation of the truth,it is a matter of time,which is a matter of whether it is from the thought of heidegger to the transfer of the time to Ereignis,and on the other hand,the two patterns of the transcendental argument.Finally,the idea that heidegger was trying to find meaning in the horizon of time,and the idea of the foundation of truth whether it was from the way of the mind of the mind or whether it was a priori argument that the method of argument was not going to work.