Analysis And Chinese Equivalence Of Korean Volitional Mood '(?)',and '(?)'

In the progress of Korean grammar teaching,many teachers only pay attention to the grammar meaning.However,in Korean grammar,there are many grammars that sometimes if they are used in different context they will have different meanings.And there are many grammars that have the same meanings or similar meanings although they are different grammar items.This can easily lead to the learner's misuse in the actual daily communication if they cannot recognize the specific use environment of the grammar.The grammar of Korean volitional mood '(?)' and '(?)' can easily make learners confused and easily lead to the learner's misuse.And they are often be used in our daily life.Therefore,in this paper,I chose '(?)'and '(?)' as the research object and aimed at helping the Korean learners or Chinese learners to use this grammar naturally and frequently by analyzing their syntactic features and semantic pragmatic features and to find their corresponding forms in Chinese.This paper from the person,predicate,tenses,negative form four aspects analyzes the two grammars' syntactic characteristics.'(?)' can be used in declarative sentences with first person and interrogative sentences with second person,but '(?)' can only be used in declarative sentences with first person.Both of them can only be used with action verbs and cannot be used in the past tense.Only through '(?)'negative sentences,can express negative meaning.This paper analyzes '(?)' and'(?)''s pragmatic features from the relationship between the listener and the speaker,communication environment pragmatic etc.Both of them can be used when the relationship between the speaker and listener is close.Mainly used for spoken and informal occasions.Each of them has different pragmatic functions.'(?)' mainly express 'hope','proposal or request','command or please' and 'threats and intimidation'and 'pure will ask' pragmatic functions,however '(?)' mainly express 'appointment','inform' and 'asking for forgiveness','thanks' pragmatic functions,etc.In order to clarify the corresponding form in Chinese in more detail,this paper analyzes the corresponding form in Chinese from the different communication environment by analyzing lots of translation examples.Although '(?)' and '(?)' can express the will of the subject,but each of them has the different characteristics and pragmatic functions.Even the same grammar,if it expresses the different pragmatic function,sometimes it has the different corresponding forms.So it is impossible to generalize.And sometimes a grammar has many different kinds of corresponding forms.Therefore there's a lot of flaws and inadequacies in terms of just going through the one-to-one.So based on the preceding research,on the basis of different pragmatic functions a this paper makes a more specific and systematic analysis and correspondence study on '(?)' and '(?)'.