The Clinical Study Of Jin's Three-needle Therapy Combined With Zolpidem In Treating Insomnia After Stroke

ObjectiveIn this study,Jin's Three-needle Therapy combined with zolpidem was used to treat Insomnia after stroke,and the effects of this treatment on the sleep status of these patients were observed,so as to provide a more efficient treatment for Insomnia after stroke in clinical practice.Methods64 patients with Insomnia after stroke admitted to the rehabilitation department of zhongshan hospital of traditional Chinese medicine in guangdong province from December 2017 to December 2018 were selected.According to the random number table method,64 patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into acupuncture-durg group and drug group,with 32 patients in each group.The acupunctur-durg e group was treated with Jin's Three-needle Therapy combined with zolpidem.The drug group was treated with zolpidem only.Before and after treatment,Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)was scored for the two groups of patients.the total scores of PSQI and the scores of the six factors which contains Sleep Quality,Sleep time,Sleep time,Sleep efficiency,Sleep disorder and daytime dysfunction were recorded.The data obtained were statistically analyzed by mathematical statistics method,and the differences in the scores of six factors of PSQI and total scores of PSQI before and after treatment between the two groups were analyzed and compared.Results1.After statistical analysis and comparison in age,gender and course of disease,the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant,which was comparable.2.PSQI of 6 factors and the total scores of the two groups before treatment showed no statistical significance,which was comparable.3.There were statistically significant differences in 6 factors of PSQI before and after treatment in the acupuncture group(P<0.01),and differences in total scores were statistically significant(P<0.05).4.There were statistically significant differences in 6 factors of PSQI before and after treatment in the drug group(P<0.01),and differences in total scores were statistically significant(P<0.05).5.There was no statistically significant difference in PSQI between the two groups before and after treatment in terms of sleep quality,sleep efficiency,and daytime dysfunction,but there was statistically significant difference in terms of sleep time,sleep time,and sleep disorders(P<0.05).6.The difference of total PSQI scores between the two groups before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01).7.The two groups of patients after the treatment of sleep efficacy comparison,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).ConclusionThe results of this study show that both of the two treatment methods have improved the sleep condition of patients with sleep disorder after stroke,and the overall efficacy is better than that of the drug group,especially in shortening the time to sleep,increasing the total sleep time,reducing sleep disorders and other aspects.