Font Size: a A A

The Textual Criticism Of?Su Wen?revise?Qian Jin Yao Fang?by Song Dynasty

Posted on:2015-03-06Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:L Y DongFull Text:PDF
GTID:2404330488498151Subject:TCM History and Literature
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In the second year of Jiayou in Earlier Song Dynasty(in 1057),Reng Zong set up the Bureau for Revising Medical Books and gathered a group of famous doctors to revise the classical medical books in all ages.The "Song ren" in this paper refer to doctors in the bureau like Song Yi,Sun Qi,Gao Baoheng,Sun Zhao."Qian Jin Yao Fang" and "Su Wen" were the works of their revising."Qian Jin Yao Fang" was finished in 652 by Sun Simiao who had deep understanding of classical medical books and abundant clinical experience.There are two important editions of?Qian Jin Yao Fang?ascended down.one was named"Bei Ji Qian Jin Yao Fang"(hereinafter referred to as "Revised Edition in Song”)that was proofreaded and published by the Bureau for Revising medical books of The North Song in the third year of Zhi Ping dynasty(in 1066),the other one-" Xin Diao Sun Zhen Ren Qian Jin Fang"(hereinafter referred to as "New Diao Edition"-was passed back from Japan.Professor Zeng Feng has proved that"New Diao Edition" was bookshop printing by folks before 1064 and without revising of Song Dynasty,and it kept largely the content of "Qian Jin Yao Fang"of Tang Dynasty,compared with external materials."Su Wen" is a part of "Huang Di Nei Jing",together with "Ling Shu".The earliest complete annotation of "Su Wen" was in Qi and Liang Dynasty of Six Dynasties Period(The sixth century).In the first year of Zong Bao in Tang Dynasty(762),based on this annotation,Wang Bing rearranged it,after which Song Renzong-Zhao Zhen conduced the revising for three times:first in the fourth year of Tian Sheng(1026),second in the second year of Jing You(1035),the last in the second year of Jia You(1057)which was in the charge of Zhang Yuxi(including LinYi).The first two revising was not published,only the third one passed down with the name 24 Volumes "Chong Guang Bu Zhu 'Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen' "((hereinafter referred to as "New Revised Edition")-the current version of "Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen".In the spreading process,Chinese medical books came to different versions to reflect diversified contents of the original book.Based on the current research results of "Qian Jin Yao Fang",this paper is going to compare“Revised Edition in Song","New Diao Edition" and the new revised research result word by word,sentence by sentence,then find the specific methods and principles for Song Dynasty collating the "Qian Jin Yao Fang",the transition of medical thought in Tang Dynasty and the development process of theory on medical in Song Dynasty.So it can provide a kind way of thinking for mutual consult research in philology.The major contents of this study involve:The content comparison among "Xin Diao Sun Zhen Ren Qian Jin Fang","Bei Ji Qian Jin Yao Fang","Chong Guang Bu Zhu "Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen".Based on the reference of the similar part between "Yi Xin Fang "which was not revised by Song Dynasty,and these books that were revised by Song Dynasty like "Shang Han Lun","Jin Kui Yu Han Jing","Jin Kui Yao Lue","Zhu Bing Yuan Hou Lun","Mai Jing","Jia Yi Jing",with "Su Wen" and "Qian Jin Fang",to find the revising principle,peculiarity and specific content of the Bureau for Revising Medical Books in Song Dynasty on "Qian Jin Yao Fang" 's medical theory.The major research methods for this paper:1 combining the verification and discussing2 combining the general discuss and specific case analysis3 statistics and comparison4 deduction5 conclusionConclusion1 To analyze the "Su Wen" part in the main body of "Qian Jin Yao Fang",which is largely different from the content of "Chong Guang Bu Zhu "Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen" ",and it may come from another lost "Su Wen".2 The parts of "Su Wen" revised by small character in Song Dynasty,are same with "Chong Guang Bu Zhu "Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen" ",and its annotation includes the main body of "Su Wen" and the annotation of Wang Bing.3 The annotations of Song Dynasty have one common character that it could expand readers' way of thinking and its medical theory' s connotation deserved our thinking.4 For the structural analysis of those examples in this paper,the annotation of Song Dynasty can be divided into word annotation,sentence annotation and paragraph annotation.The innovation of this paper:At the present academic world,the major philology research for "Qian Jin Yao Fang" focus on field of bibliology,whereas there is little work on the comparative study of medical theory between "Xin Diao Sun Zhen Ren Qian Jin Fang" and "Bei Ji Qian Jin Yao Fang”.For the application of comparative method,there is on such research.This paper' innovation lie in:a complete and systematic analysis and conclusion for the medical theory part of "Bei Ji Qian Jin Yao Fang" and "Xin Diao Sun Zhen Ren Qian Jin Fang";different the previous research focus,this paper pay more attention to the same part after revising.
Keywords/Search Tags:Song Dynasty, "Su Wen", Revise, "Qian Jin Yao Fang", The textual criticism
PDF Full Text Request
Related items