Study On The Post Occupancy Evaluation And Construction Strategy Of The Built Environment Of The Tourist Village In Guiyang

Since the 19 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,under the premise that General Secretary Xi proposed the strategy of rural revitalization,a large number of leisure tourism rural construction with rural tourism as its characteristics began to rise.With the development of rural tourism in recent years entering a mature stage,the demand for evaluation and promotion of rural built-up environment is increasingly prominent.Scientific and reasonable premise of tourism rural construction,we must face the needs of rural users objectively,accurately and comprehensively,and apply post use evaluation to tourism rural,which can effectively solve the problems after the construction of tourism rural.In this paper,the POE evaluation method is used to evaluate the typical tourist villages in Guiyang City,and the two types of rural users(villagers + tourists)are taken as the main body of evaluation.The POE fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and the user’s space use mode evaluation are carried out to evaluate the built environment of rural tourism in Guiyang city.Finally,the existing problems of the built environment of rural tourism in Guiyang city are obtained and the optimization of construction is put forward Strategy.The main conclusions are as follows:1.Based on the previous research results of rural evaluation and Poe evaluation,and based on the current situation of the case area,and using multi-disciplinary theories and methods,this paper constructs the post use evaluation system of the tourism type rural built environment in Guiyang city.Starting from the two types of users of rural residents and rural tourists,it takes rural residential environment,economic environment,ecological environment,traffic environment,social environment,infrastructure,public Based on 36 evaluation indexes,this paper evaluates the typical Tourism Villages in Guiyang city.2.Accorded to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method,the corresponding index weight of the evaluation system is established,and the following conclusions are obtained: D9 natural landscape(0.1944),D10 pollution control(0.0801),d17 traditional culture protection and continuation(0.0783),D13 external traffic convenience(0.067),D3 lighting direction(0.0658),D1 housing condition and quality(0.0496),D11 characteristic scenery(0.0481),D20 neighborhood harmony(0.0471)D12 green coverage rate(0.0417),D24 facility maintenance and management(0.0315)and other ten evaluation indicators are the main factors affecting the satisfaction of rural users.3.Accorded to the comprehensive evaluation scores,the typical Tourism Villages in Guiyang city are ranked: pianpo Village(4.177)> Longjing Village(4.151)> Shuitou Village(3.860)> laobanghe formation(3.796)> shigangpo formation(3.775)> disturbed Village(3.725)> Hongyan Village(3.707)> Sanbao Village(3.670)> Machang village(3.668)> SANTUN Village(3.597)> Gaozhai Village(3.023).From the results,it can be seen that the overall satisfaction of the built-up environment of Guiyang tourism villages is better in terms of rural residential environment,rural ecological environment,rural social environment,rural public service,rural tourism and management,and the poor evaluation of rural economic environment,rural transportation environment,rural infrastructure and rural tourism environment.4.Used the factor analysis of post use evaluation to prove the research hypothesis: 1.The linear relationship between the two types of users’ satisfaction evaluation after use of the rural built environment is coupled and consistent;2.There is no significant difference between the evaluation results of the users of different genders on the Tourism Oriented Rural areas,the traffic environment and public service in different rural areas are significantly different,and the infrastructure environment is significantly different;3 The results showed that the comprehensive scores of rural residential environment,ecological environment,traffic environment,social environment,infrastructure,public service,tourism environment,tourism service and management,and tourism rural Poe were significantly correlated.5.Through the evaluation results of the way of using the built-up environment in Guiyang tourism type rural areas,it can be concluded that:(1)for the two types of users,no matter the rural residents and the foreign tourists,the behavior mode is basically the same in the same rural space environment.(2)In terms of the distribution of the two types of user activities,the behavior nodes of residents are more concentrated,mostly in the residential area;the behavior nodes of tourists are more scattered,mostly in the tourism planning area,and the dynamic is strong.The overlapping range of residents’ spontaneous and necessary activities and tourists’ spontaneous and necessary activities is less,and the overlapping range of social activities is more.(3)The behavior activities of rural users are related to time and weather.Daytime and afternoon belong to dynamic behavior activities.Noon and evening are mostly static behavior activities.There are obvious distribution of peak season and off-season in tourism villages.(4)In Guiyang City,the most spontaneous behavior of rural tourism users is spontaneous behavior,and the rural point space and linear space are the most popular ones.(5)The user’s behavior pattern has certain spatial characteristics in the use space.The spatial characteristics of spontaneous activities are temporary.The user will often change the location of activities,with more online space and area space;the spatial characteristics of necessary activities are more fixed,with more point space and area space;the social activities are more in area space,and the spatial characteristics are temporary.6.Finally,according to the POE evaluation results of Typical Tourism Villages in Guiyang City,the existing problems of Tourism Villages in Guiyang city include: 1)tourism planning deviates from the needs of residents;2)the connotation of tourism villages is not fully explored;3)the infrastructure is not perfect;4)the gap of tourism seasonal changes is large;and four construction strategies are put forward: 1)the transformation of industrial structure and the increase of villagers’ income;2)dig deep into local characteristics and create core advantages;3)improve tourism rural infrastructure;4)optimize overall layout and create characteristic space.