Study On The Program Of Changing The Energy Nimby Facilities

Urban planning in the modern sense should originate from the needs of a series of urban development brought about by the industrial revolution and the resolution of urban issues.From the perspective of urbanization rate,China has completed the development history of Britain in the past 100 years using a short 40-year development process.The rapid urbanization of population and land has left many urban problems in China,and China's political system reform continues to deepen.The outbreak of market economic vigor tests the government's administrative capabilities at the same time.This paper focuses on the change of energy-type adjacent-avoidance facilities based on the social legal perspective of urban space and the administrative procedures of planning management.Through the grasp of energy-based adjacent-avoidance facilities projects from the establishment of projects to the results of planning changes,this paper analyzes energy-based neighboring facilities planning.The reasons for changing the appeal,the process of the game between the public and the government under this appeal,and the problems in the final planning change decision process.In this paper,several practical cases are used as examples to discuss the problems existing in the planning and alteration of energy-type adjacent-avoidance facilities.The following three conclusions are drawn: First,it is considered that the mismatch between facilities and land on the technical level of planning creates energy-based neighboring facilities.The vagueness of the plan changes;secondly,it is considered that the lack of a statutory public participation process during the implementation of the plan is an important reason for the arduous and inefficient process of the game between the public and the government.Thirdly,it is considered that the legal framework of the Urban and Rural Planning Law is formally Because of the entity's regulations or procedural constraints,it is impossible to accurately provide thelegal basis applicable to the change of planning for energy-type neighboring facilities,which is an important reason for the decline of the government's credibility.This paper takes the change of energy-type adjacent-avoidance facilities planning as an example to analyze the reasons for the change of energy-based neighboring facilities planning proposal through the grasp of energy-based adjacent-avoidance facility projects from the establishment of projects to the results of planning changes.Under this appeal,the public and the government The game process,as well as the problems in the final planning change decision process.In this paper,several practical cases are used as examples to discuss the problems existing in the planning and alteration of energy-type adjacent-avoidance facilities.The following three conclusions are drawn: First,it is considered that the mismatch between facilities and land on the technical level of planning creates energy-based neighboring facilities.The vagueness of the plan changes;secondly,it is considered that the lack of a statutory public participation process during the implementation of the plan is an important reason for the arduous and inefficient process of the game between the public and the government.Thirdly,it is considered that the legal framework of the Urban and Rural Planning Law is formally Because of the entity's regulations or procedural constraints,it is impossible to accurately provide the legal basis applicable to the change of planning for energy-type neighboring facilities,which is an important reason for the decline of the government's credibility.The article respectively optimizes the government's credibility,protects the residents' property rights,and obtains social consensus from three perspectives.It optimizes the procedures for changing the planning of energy-based adjacent-avoidance facilities: it should improve the start-up procedures for changes in the planning of energy-based adjacent-avoidance facilities as a means to improve government credibility.Institutional construction;The public participation procedures under the plan change request should be standardized and established as an important means to protect public property.The statutory procedures for establishing and improving the government's major administrative decisions should be taken as a necessary method to achieve social consensus.