Investigation On Hygienic Status Of Public Places In Gusu District,Suzhou During 2016-2017

Objective:To improve the hygienic status of public place and provide evidence of reinforcing sanitary supervision of public place,we investigate the sanitary status of public place in Gusu District of Suzhou and analyze the problems existing in sanitary management among the different type of public places.Methods:From 2016 to 2017,we performed quantitative grading of sanitary supervision of different public places in Gusu District of Suzhou and evaluate the quality of public supplies and air.Statistical software(SPSS22.0)was used to analyze the above results,combined with the sanitary characteristics of various public places and on-site inspection,then the overall status of sanitary status in public places in Gusu District was assessed.Results:1.Quantitative grading of sanitary supervision of 1907 public places in Gusu District of Suzhou was performed.There are 102 public places assessed as Grade A(5.35%),1341 places assessed as Grade B(70.32%),464 places assessed as Grade C(24.33%).Among various public places,bathing places got the worst results of which Grade B accounted for 56.16%and Grade C accounted for 38.92%.2.Classified statistical analysis of different type of public places was performed.1098 hairdressing places were quantitatively graded.58 hairdressing places were assessed as Grade A(5.28%),785 places were assessed as Grade B(71.49%)and 255 hairdressing places werre assessed as Grade C(23.22%).Traditional barbershop which had the highest percentage of Grade C(33.12%)got the worst results.583 accommodations were quantitatively graded,among which 31 were assessed as Grade A(5.32%),424 were assessed as Grade B(72.73%)and 128 were assessed as Grade C(21.96%).Ordinary hotel got the worst grading results which showed the highest percentage of Grade C(30.17%).203 bathing places were also quantitatively graded.There were 10 bathing places were assessed as Grade A(4.93%),114 bathing places assessed as Grade B(56.16%)and 79 bathing places assessed as Grade C(38.92%).The highest percentage of Grade C was assessed in public bathroom(59.18%).3.A total of 3594 public supplies were sampled from various public places and the qualification rate was 88.34%of which the bathing places got the lowest qualification rate(79.46%).Among the public supplies used in various places,the qualification rate of hairdressing tools and towel sheets in beauty salons was 83.19%and 85.49%,respectively.The qualification rate of bath towels was 85.44%in bathing places while the qualification rate of slippers was 74.16%in bathing places.4.5520 air samples were collected from vanous public places which had a qualification rate of 87.07%.Among the various public places,cultural entertainment places got the lowest qualification rate(80.96%).The qualification rate of carbon dioxide,noise and illumination is relatively low,which was 89.11%,87.55%and 86.76%,respectively,among all the evaluated indicators.5.The evaluated results of swimming venues in Gusu District showed that the qualification rate of residual chlorine in swimming pool water was the lowest(65.74%),and the qualification rate of urea was also relatively low(87.04%).The qualification rates of the school swimming pool,the hotel-affiliated swimming pool and the social swimming pool were 100%,81.25%and 47.06%,respectively.Conclusion:1.The results of quantitative grading of sanitary supervision and health evaluation in various public places showed that the sanitary condition of bathing places is the worst2.Traditional barbershops,public bathrooms and ordinary hotels have relatively low level of health management.3.The bathing places got the lowest qualification rate in all the evaluated public places.Among the various public supplies the qualification rate of the slipper of bathing places is the lowest.In addition,the qualification rates of towel and bath towel in bathing places and hairdressing tolls in beauty salons are also relatively low.4.The air quality in cultural entertainment places is the worst.Among all the evaluated indicators,the qualification rates of carbon dioxide,noise and illumination are also relatively low.5.The water quality of social swimming pool is obviously lower than that of school swimming pool and hotel-affiliated swimming pool.Residual chlorine and urea have the lowest qualification rate among all water quality indicators.