| Since the end of the 1990s, in the era of globalization, the trend of the western post modernist literary theory began to pour into china. With the prosperity and development of the market economy, China’s social and cultural transformation. At the beginning of twenty-first Century, Tao Dongfeng took the lead in the country put forward the "Aestheticization of daily life", and that will be the focus of literary studies to various literary and cultural phenomenon emerging in daily life, which caused a strong opposition to Tong Qingbing as the representative of a group of literary researchers. The domestic literary theory researchers have heated debates on the issue of "Aestheticization of daily life". "The aestheticization of everyday life"controversy reflects the previous concept of "pure literature" can not explain the literary practice and current literary phenomenon, but also reflects the literary theory of literature can not cope with the new development of the traditional culture of anxiety.It is not only the inevitable choice of literary theory, but also the inevitable choice of the present literary practice. Constructivism after negating essence of essentialism "once and for all" definition of literature, multiple thinking mode advocated by the open, nature stands in the history and local position of the construction of literature, and to "construct" literary theory.At the beginning of the twenty-first Century, Tao Dongfeng, as a representative of the approval of the researchers began to advocate in the domestic literature on the subject of reflection. In the discussion of cultural reflection on the subject of science,Tao Dongfeng in modern anti-essentialism position, reflect on China traditional literary theory of essentialism in the way of thinking, and puts forward the thought of literary theory of constructivism. Constructivism does not negate the essence, do not speak to the negative nature, but advocated the construction of literature as a historical discourse,the essence of standing in the "history" and "localization" of the construction of literary position. It is not only the inevitable choice of literary theory.but also the inevitable choice of the present literary practice to turn to the field of literature. |